Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA-seq03:21

RNA-seq

12.2K
RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases. 
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...
12.2K
Ribosome Profiling02:24

Ribosome Profiling

4.2K
Ribosome profiling or ribo-sequencing is a deep sequencing technique that produces a snapshot of active translation in a cell. It selectively sequences the mRNAs protected by ribosomes to get an insight into a cell’s translation landscape at any given point in time.
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique...
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transcriptomic Analysis of Tambaqui (<i>Colossoma macropomum</i>) Exposed to Trichlorfon-Induced Toxicity.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2025
Same author

PlantLncBoost: key features for plant lncRNA identification and significant improvement in accuracy and generalization.

The New phytologist·2025
Same author

The genome and population genomics of allopolyploid Coffea arabica reveal the diversification history of modern coffee cultivars.

Nature genetics·2024
Same author

Temporal progress of gene expression analysis with RNA-Seq data: A review on the relationship between computational methods.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2022
Same author

Analysis of co-authorship networks among Brazilian graduate programs in computer science.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Genome-wide analysis of EgEVE_1, a transcriptionally active endogenous viral element associated to small RNAs in Eucalyptus genomes.

Genetics and molecular biology·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

41.6K

RNA-Seq differential expression analysis: An extended review and a software tool.

Juliana Costa-Silva1, Douglas Domingues1,2, Fabricio Martins Lopes1

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Bioinformatics Graduate Program, Federal University of Technology - Paraná, Cornélio Procópio, PR, Brazil.

Plos One
|December 22, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) is crucial for understanding phenotypic variation. This study found that combining multiple DEG analysis methods, such as limma+voom, NOIseq, and DESeq2, ensures accurate results from RNA-Seq data.

More Related Videos

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples
07:30

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Published on: June 8, 2020

12.8K
Characterization of In Vitro Differentiation of Human Primary Keratinocytes by RNA-Seq Analysis
07:29

Characterization of In Vitro Differentiation of Human Primary Keratinocytes by RNA-Seq Analysis

Published on: May 16, 2020

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

41.6K
Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples
07:30

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Published on: June 8, 2020

12.8K
Characterization of In Vitro Differentiation of Human Primary Keratinocytes by RNA-Seq Analysis
07:29

Characterization of In Vitro Differentiation of Human Primary Keratinocytes by RNA-Seq Analysis

Published on: May 16, 2020

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Accurate identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) is essential for understanding phenotypic variation.
  • High-throughput transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) is the primary method for these studies, leading to numerous analysis software.
  • A lack of consensus exists regarding the optimal pipeline for DEG identification from RNA-Seq data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct an extended review and evaluation of various read mapping and DEG identification methods for RNA-Seq data.
  • To assess the impact of different mapping strategies and DEG analysis tools on DEG identification accuracy.
  • To develop and provide a freely available software tool for comprehensive DEG analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of six read mapping methods, including pseudo-alignment and quasi-mapping.
  • Assessment of nine DEG identification methods using real RNA-Seq data.
  • Validation against quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) data as the gold standard.

Main Results:

  • Read mapping methods showed minimal impact on final DEG analysis when using annotated reference genomes.
  • The DEG identification methods limma+voom, NOIseq, and DESeq2 demonstrated the most consistent results.
  • A consensus approach combining multiple DEG identification methods significantly enhances the accuracy of the identified gene list.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of read mapping method has a limited effect on DEG identification accuracy with annotated genomes.
  • Specific DEG identification tools (limma+voom, NOIseq, DESeq2) are recommended for consistent results.
  • Combining multiple DEG analysis methods provides a more accurate and reliable set of differentially expressed genes, a feature integrated into the developed software.