Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

14:20
Polymalic Acid-based Nano Biopolymers for Targeting of Multiple Tumor Markers: An Opportunity for Personalized Medicine?
Published on: June 13, 2014
17.1K
Optimization and comparison of CD4-targeting lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles using different binding ligands
Shijie Cao1, Yonghou Jiang1, Claire N Levy2
1Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A
|December 23, 2017
Summary
Targeting efficacy of nanocarriers (NCs) depends on surface conjugation. Negatively charged lipid-coated nanoparticles showed superior targeting of CD4+ T cells using anti-CD4 antibodies and fragments compared to peptides.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Nanotechnology
- Immunology
Background:
- Monoclonal antibodies and peptides are conjugated to nanocarriers (NCs) for targeted delivery.
- Targeting efficacy is influenced by the specificity, affinity, avidity of conjugates, and physicochemical properties of NCs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the targeting efficacy of a CD4 binding peptide (BP4) and an anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (CD4 mAb) and its fragments when conjugated to lipid-coated poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid nanoparticles (LCNPs).
- To investigate the impact of NC surface charge on targeting specificity.
Main Methods:
- Lipid-coated poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid nanoparticles (LCNPs) were prepared with varying surface charges.
- CD4 binding peptide (BP4), anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (CD4 mAb), and its fragments were conjugated to negatively charged LCNPs (cbLCNPs).
- In vitro binding assays were performed using human T cell line 174xCEM and pigtail macaque peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Main Results:
- Negatively charged cbLCNPs significantly reduced nonspecific binding and enhanced targeting specificity compared to neutral or positively charged LCNPs.
- CD4 mAb and its fragments conjugated to cbLCNPs demonstrated high in vitro binding to CD4+ T cells, while BP4 did not.
- CD4-cbLCNPs exhibited 10-fold higher binding specificity for CD4+ T cells over CD8+ T cells; fragment conjugates showed higher overall binding but lower specificity.
Conclusions:
- The ζ-potential of nanocarriers critically influences targeting efficacy.
- Anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody and its fragments are superior candidates for targeted delivery to CD4+ T cells compared to the BP4 peptide.
- Optimized nanocarrier formulation and targeting ligand selection are crucial for effective targeted therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Site-Targeted Drug Delivery Systems: Polymeric Carriers
17
Polymeric carriers enhance targeted drug delivery by increasing efficacy while minimizing off-target effects. These carriers comprise a biodegradable polymeric backbone integrated with functional elements that enable targeting, improve physicochemical properties, and regulate drug release.Targeting MechanismsThe targeting ability of polymeric carriers is mediated by a homing device, which is a molecular recognition component designed to selectively bind to specific tissues or cells. Monoclonal...
17
Modified-Release Drug Delivery Systems: Site-Targeted
18
Site-targeted drug delivery systems enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing systemic toxicity and treatment costs. Unlike conventional methods, these systems ensure precise drug delivery, improving bioavailability and reducing side effects. Targeted drug delivery is classified into three levels. First-order targeting directs drugs to the capillary beds of specific organs or tissues. Second-order targets specific cell types, such as tumor cells, using receptor-mediated interactions.
18

