Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.9K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.9K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.7K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.7K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

12.5K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.5K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

392
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
392

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dimensional association between ADHD traits and gray matter volume in young adults: A voxel-based morphometry study.

PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2026
Same author

Redox-Neutral Interstitial Hydride Incorporation in Ruddlesden-Popper Oxides.

Inorganic chemistry·2026
Same author

Human and Robot Assistance for Cognitive Load in Younger and Older Adults: Multimodal Within-Subject Experimental Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Biomimetic Microfibers for Myelin-Enhancer Screening and Neural Regeneration.

Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

Associations Between the Gut Microbiota and Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Journal of aging research·2026
Same author

Reductive-defect-suppressed titanium oxynitrides <i>via</i> Ca<sub>3</sub>N<sub>2</sub>-assisted topochemical nitridation.

Chemical science·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.8K

Refractive error is associated with intracranial volume.

Hikaru Takeuchi1, Yasuyuki Taki2,3,4, Rui Nouchi5,6,7

  • 1Division of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. takehi@idac.tohoku.ac.jp.

Scientific Reports
|January 11, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Refractive error in young adults is weakly linked to cranial volume, not brain matter. Psychometric intelligence correlates with brain volume, but not refractive error or cranial size.

More Related Videos

Intracranial Pharmacotherapy and Pain Assays in Rodents
02:26

Intracranial Pharmacotherapy and Pain Assays in Rodents

Published on: April 9, 2019

5.9K
Fabrication of Refractive-index-matched Devices for Biomedical Microfluidics
09:54

Fabrication of Refractive-index-matched Devices for Biomedical Microfluidics

Published on: September 10, 2018

8.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.8K
Intracranial Pharmacotherapy and Pain Assays in Rodents
02:26

Intracranial Pharmacotherapy and Pain Assays in Rodents

Published on: April 9, 2019

5.9K
Fabrication of Refractive-index-matched Devices for Biomedical Microfluidics
09:54

Fabrication of Refractive-index-matched Devices for Biomedical Microfluidics

Published on: September 10, 2018

8.0K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Anatomy

Background:

  • Myopia, a common refractive error, has been hypothesized to link with brain anatomy.
  • Understanding the relationship between brain structure and refractive error is crucial for public health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate associations between brain structures and refractive error in young adults.
  • To explore the relationship between psychometric intelligence, brain anatomy, and refractive error.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 1,319 educated young adults was studied.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to analyze brain structures.
  • Refractive error and psychometric intelligence were measured.

Main Results:

  • Refractive error showed a negative correlation with total intracranial volume and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume.
  • No significant association was found between refractive error and gray matter volume (GMV) or white matter volume (WMV).
  • Psychometric intelligence correlated positively with GMV and WMV, but not with refractive error or CSF volume.

Conclusions:

  • Refractive error in young adults is primarily associated with cranial volume, not brain tissue volume.
  • Psychometric intelligence is associated with brain volume, independent of refractive error.