Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Endothelialized Microfluidics for Studying Microvascular Interactions in Hematologic Diseases
Published on: June 22, 2012
Delineation of epicardial stenosis in patients with microvascular disease using pressure drop coefficient: A pilot
Ullhas Udaya Hebbar1, Mohamed A Effat2, Srikara V Peelukhana3
1Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States.
Aim:
To investigate the patient-outcomes of newly developed pressure drop coefficient (CDP) in diagnosing epicardial stenosis (ES) in the presence of concomitant microvascular disease (MVD).
Methods:
Patients from our clinical trial were divided into two subgroups with: (1) cut-off of coronary flow reserve (CFR) < 2.0; and (2) diabetes. First, correlations were performed for both subgroups between CDP and hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR), a diagnostic parameter for assessing the severity of MVD. Linear regression analysis was used for these correlations. Further, in each of the subgroups, comparisons were made between fractional flow reserve (FFR) < 0.75 and CDP > 27.9 groups for assessing major adverse cardiac events (MACE: Primary outcome). Comparisons were also made between the survival curves for FFR < 0.75 and CDP > 27.9 groups. Two tailed chi-squared and Fischer's exact tests were performed for comparison of the primary outcomes, and the log-rank test was used to compare the Kaplan-Meier survival curves. P < 0.05 for all tests was considered statistically significant.
Results:
Significant linear correlations were observed between CDP and HMR for both CFR < 2.0 (r = 0.58, P < 0.001) and diabetic (r = 0.61, P < 0.001) patients. In the CFR < 2.0 subgroup, the %MACE (primary outcomes) for CDP > 27.9 group (7.7%, 2/26) was lower than FFR < 0.75 group (3/14, 21.4%); P = 0.21. Similarly, in the diabetic subgroup, the %MACE for CDP > 27.9 group (12.5%, 2/16) was lower than FFR < 0.75 group (18.2%, 2/11); P = 0.69. Survival analysis for CFR < 2.0 subgroup indicated better event-free survival for CDP > 27.9 group (n = 26) when compared with FFR < 0.75 group (n = 14); P = 0.10. Similarly, for the diabetic subgroup, CDP > 27.9 group (n = 16) showed higher survival times compared to FFR group (n = 11); P = 0.58.
Conclusion:
CDP correlated significantly with HMR and resulted in better %MACE as well as survival rates in comparison to FFR. These positive trends demonstrate that CDP could be a potential diagnostic endpoint for delineating MVD with or without ES.
More Related Videos
10:11Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
Published on: October 22, 2014
07:44Epicardial Outgrowth Culture Assay and Ex Vivo Assessment of Epicardial-derived Cell Migration
Published on: March 18, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Excess Pressure Inside a Drop and a Bubble
Pilot and Numeric Relaying
Coefficient of Variation
The coefficient of variation is a practical statistical tool in finance. It allows investors to assess the volatility or...
Coefficient of Correlation
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
Confidence Coefficient
Thermodynamics: Activity Coefficient
The activity coefficient is a measure of the deviation from ideal behavior. When the ionic strength of the solution is minimal, the activity coefficient of an ionic species is close to unity, making...