Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.9K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.9K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.7K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.7K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

46.2K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
46.2K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

12.5K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leveraging Vulnerabilities in Temporal Graph Neural Networks via Strategic High-Impact Assaults.

Proceedings of the ... ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management·2026
Same author

Context-Driven Active Contour (CDAC): A Novel Medical Image Segmentation Method Based on Active Contour and Contextual Understanding.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Rethinking max-min planning on energy-efficient software-defined networking for 5G networks.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

QoS Review: Smart Sensing in Wake of COVID-19, Current Trends and Specifications With Future Research Directions.

IEEE sensors journal·2023
Same author

W-GUN: Whale Optimization for Energy and Delay-Centric Green Underwater Networks.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

Inertial-Navigation-Aided Single-Satellite Highly Dynamic Positioning Algorithm.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2019
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Measurement of Dynamic Force Acted on Water Strider Leg Jumping Upward by the PVDF Film Sensor
07:17

Measurement of Dynamic Force Acted on Water Strider Leg Jumping Upward by the PVDF Film Sensor

Published on: August 3, 2018

6.5K

A Sensor Dynamic Measurement Error Prediction Model Based on NAPSO-SVM.

Minlan Jiang1, Lan Jiang2, Dingde Jiang3

  • 1College of Mathematics, Physics and Information Engineering, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China. xx99@zjnu.cn.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 19, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel Support Vector Machine (SVM) method using improved particle swarm optimization (NAPSO) for accurate dynamic measurement error prediction in sensors. NAPSO-SVM demonstrates superior precision and reduced errors compared to other optimization techniques.

Keywords:
dynamic measurement errorsimproved PSOpredictionsensorssupport vector machine

More Related Videos

Dynamic Electrochemical Measurement of Chloride Ions
07:32

Dynamic Electrochemical Measurement of Chloride Ions

Published on: February 5, 2016

12.1K
Construction of Models for Nondestructive Prediction of Ingredient Contents in Blueberries by Near-infrared Spectroscopy Based on HPLC Measurements
10:25

Construction of Models for Nondestructive Prediction of Ingredient Contents in Blueberries by Near-infrared Spectroscopy Based on HPLC Measurements

Published on: June 28, 2016

11.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Measurement of Dynamic Force Acted on Water Strider Leg Jumping Upward by the PVDF Film Sensor
07:17

Measurement of Dynamic Force Acted on Water Strider Leg Jumping Upward by the PVDF Film Sensor

Published on: August 3, 2018

6.5K
Dynamic Electrochemical Measurement of Chloride Ions
07:32

Dynamic Electrochemical Measurement of Chloride Ions

Published on: February 5, 2016

12.1K
Construction of Models for Nondestructive Prediction of Ingredient Contents in Blueberries by Near-infrared Spectroscopy Based on HPLC Measurements
10:25

Construction of Models for Nondestructive Prediction of Ingredient Contents in Blueberries by Near-infrared Spectroscopy Based on HPLC Measurements

Published on: June 28, 2016

11.2K

Area of Science:

  • Engineering
  • Computer Science
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Dynamic measurement error correction is crucial for enhancing sensor precision.
  • Support Vector Machine (SVM) is commonly used for predicting sensor dynamic measurement errors, but manual parameter tuning limits performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate an improved Support Vector Machine (SVM) method, termed NAPSO-SVM, for predicting dynamic measurement errors in sensors.
  • To enhance the SVM's predictive accuracy by optimizing its parameters using a novel algorithm.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, named NAPSO, incorporating natural selection and simulated annealing to improve local optima avoidance.
  • Applied the NAPSO algorithm to optimize SVM parameters for dynamic measurement error prediction.
  • Compared the performance of NAPSO-SVM against standard PSO-SVM and Glowworm Swarm Optimization-SVM (GSO-SVM) using sensor error data.

Main Results:

  • The NAPSO-SVM method achieved higher prediction precision and lower prediction errors compared to PSO-SVM and GSO-SVM.
  • Evaluation metrics included Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE).
  • Experimental results validated the effectiveness of NAPSO-SVM in dynamic measurement error prediction.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed NAPSO-SVM method is an effective approach for predicting dynamic measurement errors in sensors.
  • The integration of natural selection and simulated annealing in PSO significantly improves SVM parameter optimization.
  • NAPSO-SVM offers a more precise and reliable solution for sensor error prediction compared to existing methods.