Related Concept Videos
Nonconscious Mimicry
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
Language and Cognition
Working Memory
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Non-Verbal Cues
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Correction: How and why humans trust: A meta-analysis and elaborated model.
Adaptive training instructional interventions: A meta-analysis.
Adapting training in real time: An empirical test of adaptive difficulty schedules.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
Ceci n'est pas un walrus: lexical processing in vigilance performance.
Alexis R Neigel1, Victoria L Claypoole2, Gabriella M Hancock3
1Computational and Information Sciences Directorate, United States Army Research Laboratory, 321 Johnson Street, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA. alexis.neigel@gmail.com.
This study explored how stimulus meaning impacts sustained attention (vigilance). Introducing semantically similar lures significantly altered decision-making criteria in a lexical vigilance task.
More Related Videos
08:32Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
Published on: September 5, 2019
06:48Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Psycholinguistics
Background:
- Vigilance, the ability to sustain attention, is crucial for many real-world tasks.
- Traditional vigilance research often uses non-lexical tasks, leaving a gap in understanding lexical processing.
- The impact of stimulus meaning on vigilance performance remains under-investigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of stimulus meaning on vigilance performance.
- To examine 'lure effects' in a lexical vigilance task.
- To understand how semantically similar lures influence decision-making in attention tasks.
Main Methods:
- A 12-minute lexical vigilance task was administered to 126 observers.
- Participants were randomly assigned to a standard task or a lure task (including categorically similar lures).
- A novel analytical approach involved post hoc division of lure groups based on false alarm rates.
Main Results:
- The presence of lure stimuli significantly affected decision-making criteria in the lexical vigilance task.
- Lure stimuli influenced measures of sensitivity and response bias within signal detection theory.
- False alarm rates post hoc analysis revealed distinct patterns of performance.
Conclusions:
- Stimulus meaning, particularly semantic similarity, plays a significant role in vigilance performance.
- Lure stimuli can alter response biases and reduce sensitivity in lexical attention tasks.
- Findings highlight the importance of considering semantic properties in vigilance research and task design.