Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
Published on: August 4, 2020
L5 En-Bloc Vertebrectomy with Customized Reconstructive Implant: Comparison of Patient-Specific Versus Off-the-Shelf
Ralph J Mobbs1, Wen Jie Choy2, Peter Wilson3
1Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia; NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Background:
Spine surgery has the potential to benefit from additive manufacturing/3-dimensional printing (3DP) technology with complex anatomical pathologies requiring reconstruction, with the potential to customize surgery to reduce operative times, reduce blood loss, provide immediate stability, and potentially improve fusion rates. We report a unique case of intraoperative trial placement of a custom patient-specific implant (PSI) versus the final implantation of a customizable off-the-shelf (OTS) implant. Data collected for comparison included time to implant, ease of implantation, firmness of press-fit, and fixation options after implantation.
Case Description:
A 64-year-old man presented with low back pain. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a solitary lesion in the L5 vertebral body, confirmed by positron emission tomography scan. Removal of the L5 vertebral body was performed, and reconstruction was achieved with an expandable cage. The time of implant insertion was minimal with the PSI (90 seconds) versus the OTS (>40 minutes). Immediate press-fit and "firmness" of implantation was clearly superior with the PSI, although this was an intraoperative subjective assessment. Other benefits include integral fixation that is predetermined with the PSI, reduced time and blood loss, and ease of bone grafting with a PSI.
Conclusions:
Use of 3DP has been able to reduce operative time significantly. Surgeons can train before performing complex procedures, which enhances their presurgical planning, with the goal to maximize patient outcomes. When considering implants and prostheses, the use of 3DP allows a superior anatomical fit for the patient, with the potential to improve restoration of anatomy.
More Related Videos
07:11Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
13:35Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Drug Delivery Systems: Injectables, Implants, and Infusion Devices
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation