Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Chronic Constriction of the Sciatic Nerve and Pain Hypersensitivity Testing in Rats
Published on: March 13, 2012
Skin Testing for Suspected Iodinated Contrast Media Hypersensitivity.
Rik Schrijvers1, Christine Breynaert2, Yazid Ahmedali3
1Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Clinical Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Exploration des Allergies, Département de Pneumologie et Addictologie, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Skin testing for iodinated contrast medium (ICM) hypersensitivity has a high negative predictive value (NPV), indicating it can safely identify patients who can be re-exposed to ICM. This method helps manage ICM allergy, with most re-exposures being well-tolerated.
Area of Science:
- Allergy and Immunology
- Radiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Iodinated contrast medium (ICM) hypersensitivity management is debated.
- Skin testing is proposed to identify allergic patients, alongside avoidance or provocation.
- Premedication strategies are also considered for ICM hypersensitivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the negative predictive value (NPV) of skin testing for iodinated contrast medium (ICM) hypersensitivity.
- To assess the safety of ICM re-exposure in patients with negative skin tests.
- To determine the efficacy of skin testing in managing ICM allergy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective evaluation of 597 patients with ICM hypersensitivity reactions over 13.5 years.
- Skin testing performed to assess for ICM allergy.
- Patients with negative skin tests were assessed for tolerance upon re-exposure to ICM.
- Premedication advised only for specific patient groups with negative skin tests.
Main Results:
- Overall NPV of skin testing for ICM was 93.1%.
- NPV for immediate hypersensitivity was 94.2%, and for nonimmediate was 86.1%.
- Re-exposure to ICM was tolerated in 93.1% of patients with negative skin tests.
- Premedication was associated with a higher incidence of reactions.
Conclusions:
- Skin testing is valuable for identifying safe ICM alternatives for re-exposure, particularly in immediate hypersensitivity.
- Patients with skin test-proven ICM allergy can often be safely re-exposed.
- Reactions upon re-exposure are infrequent, mostly mild, and can occur even with premedication.
Related Concept Videos
Hypersensitivities
Types of Hypersensitivities
Hypersensitivity reactions are categorized into four types: Type 1, Type 2, Type 3, and Type 4. Each type has a distinct mechanism...
Hypersensitivity Reactions: Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions
Hypersensitivity Reactions: Cytolytic Reactions
Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...
Hypersensitivity Reactions: Immune-Complex Reactions
Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution: Fluorination and Iodination of Benzene

