Strategies to Avoid Underdiagnosing Pit-and-Fissure Caries

Traditionally, testing for whether pit-and-fissure caries should be restored involved probing with a sharp explorer and evaluating resistance to withdrawal (ie, "stick"). Alternative visual methods of evaluation and classification have been proposed, validated, and accepted formally in the core curriculum on caries management in both Europe and North America. This article examines the resistance to occlusal breakdown of fluoridehardened enamel despite progression of underlying dentin caries with accompanying difficulty in diagnosis. Traditional methods of pit-and-fissure caries diagnosis, including radiographs or fissure probing with an explorer, have been shown to be inaccurate and potentially destructive. The clinical process of using the visual/tactile International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) and/or the Caries Classification System (CCS) is described and illustrated through case examples.