Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: May 10, 2022
Evaluation of chest compression artefact removal based on rhythm assessments made by clinicians
Erik Alonso1, Elisabete Aramendi2, Unai Irusta2
1Department of Applied Mathematics, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Rafael Moreno "Pitxitxi", 3, 48013 Bilbao, Spain.
Aim:
To evaluate the performance of a state-of-the-art cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) artefact suppression method by assessing to what extent the filtered electrocardiogram (ECG) can be correctly diagnosed by emergency medicine doctors.
Methods:
A total of 819 ECG segments were used. Each segment contained two consecutive 10 s intervals, an artefact free interval and an interval corrupted by CPR artefacts. Each ECG segment was digitally processed to remove CPR artefacts using an adaptive filter. Each ECG segment was split into artefact-free and filtered intervals, randomly reordered for dissociation, and independently offered to four reviewers for rhythm annotation. The rhythm annotations of the artefact-free intervals were considered as the gold standard against which the rhythm annotations of the filtered intervals were evaluated. For the filtered intervals, the rater agreement (κ, Kappa score) with the gold standard, the sensitivity and the specificity were computed individually for each reviewer, and jointly through the majority decision of the pool of reviewers (DPR). These results were also compared to those obtained using a commercial shock advisory algorithm (SAA).
Results:
The agreement between each reviewer and the gold standard was moderate ranging between κ = 0.41-0.64. The sensitivities and specificities ranged between 64.3-95.0%, and 70.0-95.9%, respectively. The agreement for the DPR was substantial with κ = 0.64 (0.62-0.66), a sensitivity of 90.6%, and a specificity of 85.6%. For the SAA, the agreement was fair with κ = 0.33 (0.31-0.35), a sensitivity of 90.3%, and a specificity of 66.4%.
Conclusion:
Clinicians outperformed the SAA, but specificities remained below the specifications recommended by the American Heart Association. Visual assessment of the filtered ECG by clinicians is not reliable enough, and varies greatly among clinicians. Results considerably improve by considering the consensus decision of a pool of clinicians.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Flail Chest-I
Flail chest is a severe and potentially life-threatening condition characterized by the fracture of three or more adjacent ribs in multiple places. It is most commonly caused by direct impacts and trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents or injuries from a steering wheel impact. It can also occur due to falls in elderly individuals with osteoporosis, or assaults involving sharp objects.
Pathophysiology
The pathophysiology of flail chest is complex, involving fractures of...
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Chest Physiotherapy
Purpose
CPT is primarily used for patients with excessive bronchial secretions who have difficulty clearing...
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
ECG Interpretation of Rhythms
Components of the Electrocardiogram
The primary components of a normal ECG waveform in Normal sinus rhythm(NSR) include the P wave, PR interval, QRS complex, ST segment, T wave, and occasionally a U wave.
ECG waveforms are divided by vertical and horizontal lines at standard intervals.
The horizontal axis measures time and rate, and the vertical axis measures amplitude or voltage....

