Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Quantitative Uncertainty Analysis for a Weed Risk Assessment System.
Barney P Caton1, Anthony L Koop2, Larry Fowler3
1U.S. Department of Agriculture, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Center for Plant Health Science and Technology, Raleigh, NC, USA.
This study introduces a probabilistic model to assess uncertainty in weed risk assessments (WRA). The model quantifies how uncertainty impacts invasive species risk ratings, improving management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Invasive Species Management
- Risk Assessment
Background:
- Weed risk assessments (WRA) are crucial for preventing invasive plant introductions.
- Existing WRAs often lack robust methods for incorporating and evaluating uncertainty.
- Uncertainty is a fundamental component of risk assessment that needs quantitative evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and test a probabilistic model for quantitatively evaluating the effects of uncertainty on question-based WRAs in the United States.
- To assess how different levels of uncertainty (Negligible, Low, Moderate, High) influence WRA outcomes.
- To improve the interpretation and reliability of WRA results for regulatory and management decisions.
Main Methods:
- Developed a probabilistic model to simulate the impact of response uncertainty on WRA scores.
- Assigned likelihoods of response changes based on four uncertainty ratings.
- Simulated WRA outcomes by determining response changes, selecting new responses, and summing scores.
- Tested the model on 204 species assessments to analyze variations in risk ratings.
Main Results:
- Simulated risk score ranges increased with higher uncertainty levels.
- Most species assessments (87%) produced simulated risk ratings that matched the baseline WRA rating.
- High uncertainty generally led to a wider range of potential risk ratings, with most frequent ratings aligning with baseline for High Risk species.
- Accuracy of WRA did not improve by changing final ratings based on uncertainty analysis alone.
Conclusions:
- The probabilistic model effectively quantifies the influence of uncertainty on WRA outcomes.
- While most ratings remained consistent, uncertainty analysis highlights potential variability, especially for Low Risk assessments.
- Reducing assessment uncertainty is most effectively achieved by gathering evidence for unanswered questions.
- This approach enhances the regulation and management of potential invasive weed species by providing a more nuanced understanding of risk.
Related Concept Videos
The Uncertainty Principle
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Quantitative Analysis
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the...
Uncertainty: Overview
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

