Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

14:15
Measurement Of Neuromagnetic Brain Function In Pre-school Children With Custom Sized MEG
Published on: February 19, 2010
17.3K
Preschool Children Transfer Real-World Moral Reasoning into Pretense
Anne A Fast1, Jennifer Van Reet2
1University of Washington, Department of Psychology, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98105, United States.
Cognitive Development
|March 17, 2018
Summary
Preschoolers apply real-world morality to pretend situations, especially those closely resembling reality. Antisocial acts in fantastical pretense were judged more acceptable than in realistic pretense or reality.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Moral Psychology
- Cognitive Development
Background:
- Children often transfer knowledge between real and pretend worlds.
- Previous research shows transfer of object properties, causality, and problem-solving.
- The extension of moral reasoning into pretense remains less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if preschoolers extend moral principles from reality into pretense.
- To determine if the proximity of the pretend world to reality influences this moral transfer.
- To examine the boundary between children's understanding of reality and fantasy in moral judgments.
Main Methods:
- Preschoolers (N=63) evaluated the acceptability of antisocial behaviors.
- Scenarios included pretend, fantastical, and non-pretend (real-world) contexts.
- Children's judgments were compared across these different scenario types.
Main Results:
- Antisocial behaviors were judged equally unacceptable in both pretend and non-pretend situations.
- Antisocial behaviors were deemed more acceptable in fantastical pretend scenarios.
- Moral judgments were more consistent with reality in pretend scenarios closer to the real world.
Conclusions:
- Preschoolers extend their real-world moral representations into pretend play.
- The degree of moral transfer is influenced by the realism of the pretend scenario.
- Findings offer insights into children's moral reasoning and their grasp of the reality-fantasy distinction.
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
7.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.5K
Reasoning
440
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
440
Deductive Reasoning
69.3K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
69.3K
Inductive Reasoning
67.9K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
67.9K
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
1.0K
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
1.0K
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
324
Pediatric patient dosages diverge from adults due to disparities in body surface area, total body water, and extracellular fluid per kilogram of body weight. The dosing regimen considers the variations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacology across distinct age groups, encompassing preterm newborns, infants, young children, older children, and adolescents. Calculation of pediatric patient doses is predicated on determining body surface area, which exhibits a superior correlation with the child's...
324

