Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
Situating Green Infrastructure in Context: A Framework for Adaptive Socio-Hydrology in Cities
L A Schifman1, D L Herrmann2, W D Shuster3
1NRC Postdoctoral Research Associate, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 USA.
Green infrastructure (GI) planning needs to integrate social factors beyond just stormwater. A new Framework for Adaptive Socio-Hydrology (FrASH) enables multi-stakeholder collaboration for resilient urban systems.
Area of Science:
- Urban hydrology and socio-hydrological systems.
- Green infrastructure (GI) planning and implementation.
- Multi-stakeholder adaptive management frameworks.
Background:
- Current green infrastructure (GI) management primarily focuses on stormwater, neglecting social dimensions and co-benefits.
- This hydrology-centric approach results in centralized, disconnected urban landscapes and missed opportunities for broader benefits.
- Additional benefits of GI include increased property value, improved aesthetics, heat island mitigation, carbon sequestration, and biodiversity support.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce an integrated socio-hydrological approach for GI planning and implementation.
- To propose a Framework for Adaptive Socio-Hydrology (FrASH) for collaborative, context-guided GI project planning.
- To demonstrate how FrASH can enhance the multi-functionality and resilience of urban systems.
Main Methods:
- Development of the Framework for Adaptive Socio-Hydrology (FrASH).
- Application of FrASH to diverse GI case studies using a graphical Chambered Nautilus model.
- Analysis of multi-stakeholder network dynamics and co-evolving decision-making processes.
Main Results:
- FrASH facilitates an iterative, multifaceted decision-making process involving diverse stakeholders.
- The framework enables the creation of connected, decentralized networks across sectors (governance, NGOs, academia, industry).
- Application to case studies demonstrated enhanced multi-functionality and potential for managing urban system resilience.
Conclusions:
- Integrating social and hydrological dimensions through FrASH moves beyond traditional, purely hydrology-driven GI planning.
- A multi-stakeholder, decentralized network with adaptive planning enhances GI's multi-functionality and urban resilience.
- FrASH offers a scalable model for managing complex urban socio-hydrological systems.
More Related Videos
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
10:30Soil Lysimeter Excavation for Coupled Hydrological, Geochemical, and Microbiological Investigations
Published on: September 11, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Self Within Cultural Contexts
Green Algae
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Vygotsky's Cognitive Development in Cultural Context
Natural Selection and Adaptation
Beyond physical adaptations,...
Adaptability of Cytoskeletal Filaments