Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

09:10
Fabrication and Testing of Microfluidic Optomechanical Oscillators
Published on: May 29, 2014
12.7K
Spin-optomechanical coupling between light and a nanofiber torsional mode.
Optics Letters
|March 31, 2018
Summary
Researchers used light
Area of Science:
- Optomechanics
- Quantum optics
- Nanotechnology
Background:
- Light possesses linear and angular momentum, enabling interactions with mechanical objects.
- Photon momentum transfer can induce optomechanical effects via absorption or polarization changes.
- Spin angular momentum of light is a key factor in these interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate resonant driving of torsional mechanical modes in an optical nanofiber.
- To utilize the spin angular momentum of light for this driving.
- To explore optical nanofibers as a platform for quantum spin-optomechanics.
Main Methods:
- Characterization of nanofiber torsional modes using polarimetry.
- Resonant driving of modes using amplitude-modulated light with controlled polarization.
- Measurement of mechanical oscillation amplification as a function of light polarization.
Main Results:
- Identified narrow natural resonances in the nanofiber's torsional spectrum (Q≈2,000).
- Achieved resonant driving of individual torsional modes by modulating light.
- Observed maximum mechanical oscillation amplification (>35 dB) with longitudinal spin on the nanofiber waist.
Conclusions:
- Optical nanofibers are suitable for experiments in quantum spin-optomechanics.
- Spin angular momentum of light can effectively drive mechanical modes in nanofibers.
- Demonstrated a significant amplification of mechanical oscillations using tailored light polarization.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
1.7K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.7K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
1.5K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.5K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
3.3K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.3K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
Torsion of Noncircular Members
601
Circular shafts undergoing torsional stress maintain their cross-sectional integrity due to their axisymmetric nature. This symmetry ensures an even distribution of stress, allowing the shaft to withstand torsion without distorting. In contrast, square bars, lacking this axial symmetry, experience significant distortion across their cross-sections when subjected to torsion, with the exception of along their diagonals and at lines connecting midpoints. A detailed examination of a cubic element...
601

