Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.3K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.3K
Prevalence and Incidence01:08

Prevalence and Incidence

1.9K
In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
1.9K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.3K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.3K
Correlations02:20

Correlations

36.6K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
36.6K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.4K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.4K
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

42.9K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
42.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Team Workload in Action Teams: A Review of Empirical Research.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Towards Adaptive Autonomous Vehicle Systems: Considering Trust and Risk Perception during Failures.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2025
Same author

Bio-behavioral Team Dynamics Measurement System: Multimodal Sensing, Dynamical Systems Modeling, and Machine Learning Pipelines to Predict and Characterize Team Performance.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Improving Situational Awareness During Interfacility Transport Using a Transport Monitoring and Communication Application: A Simulation-Based Pilot Study.

Journal of patient safety·2025
Same author

A simulation-based approach to analysing delays in the transport of critically ill neonates.

Health systems (Basingstoke, England)·2025
Same author

Are humans still necessary? Expanding the discussion.

Ergonomics·2025
Same journal

System-Wide Trust (SWT) Versus Component-Specific Trust (CST) in Multi-Agent Human-Agent Teams: Individual Variability in Trust Bias.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Driver Adaptation to Partially Automated Driving in Urban Environments: Effects of Repeated Exposure and System Capabilities on Drivers' Trust, Monitoring, and Response.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Towards Safe and Comfortable Vehicle Control Transitions: A Systematic Review of Takeover Time, Time Budget, and Takeover Outcomes.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

What's in a Name? Implications of AI Roles and Mind Perception for Human-AI Teams.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Safety Climate and Safety Behavior and Outcomes: A Comprehensive Systematic Review in Healthcare From the Perspective of Staff and Patients.

Human factors·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.8K

Information-Pooling Bias in Collaborative Security Incident Correlation Analysis.

Prashanth Rajivan1, Nancy J Cooke1

  • 1Arizona State University, Mesa.

Human Factors
|April 4, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Security teams struggle to share unique information during incident correlation due to information-pooling bias. Specialized visualization tools are needed to improve collaborative threat detection and overcome cognitive limitations.

Keywords:
cybersecurityhidden profile paradigmsecurity visualizationteamworkthreat detection

More Related Videos

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers
07:26

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

8.6K
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.8K
BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers
07:26

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

8.6K
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cybersecurity
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Information-pooling bias hinders teams from sharing unique data.
  • This bias's impact on cybersecurity team collaboration is understudied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of group-level information-pooling bias on collaborative incident correlation.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of different collaboration aids in mitigating this bias.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty 3-person teams performed threat detection and incident correlation tasks.
  • Teams used varying collaboration aids under a hidden profile paradigm.
  • Communication patterns were analyzed to assess information sharing.

Main Results:

  • Teams predominantly discussed commonly known information, neglecting unique data.
  • Unaided collaboration proved inefficient for correlating unique security incidents.
  • Visualizations effectively mitigated information-pooling bias by enhancing perception and memory.

Conclusions:

  • Security analyst teams may be inefficient at pooling unique information.
  • Standard collaboration tools are insufficient for cybersecurity defense.
  • Developing collaborative security visualization tools tailored to cognitive limitations is crucial.