Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

07:37
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
Published on: August 1, 2017
9.4K
A Study of the Effects of Electrode Number and Decoding Algorithm on Online EEG-Based BCI Behavioral Performance
Jianjun Meng1, Bradley J Edelman2, Jaron Olsoe2
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Frontiers in Neuroscience
|April 24, 2018
Summary
Brain-computer interface (BCI) performance depends on channel number and decoding method. A Laplacian Filtering (LAP/S) method with fewer channels improved user performance over multiple sessions, unlike Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) methods.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Signal Processing
Background:
- Motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) decode movement intentions using electroencephalography (EEG).
- Channel selection and decoding algorithms significantly impact BCI performance.
- Limited online studies compare these factors across multiple training sessions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effect of channel number and decoding method on BCI performance progression across multiple training sessions.
- To investigate associated neurophysiological changes during BCI control.
- To compare Laplacian Filtering (LAP/S) and Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) algorithms with varying channel configurations.
Main Methods:
- Forty-five subjects were divided into three groups: LAP/S (9 channels), CSP/L (40 channels), and CSP/S (9 channels).
- Online BCI performance and EEG data were recorded across multiple training sessions.
- Statistical analysis compared performance metrics and neurophysiological correlates between groups.
Main Results:
- CSP/L showed higher initial performance than LAP/S, with no significant difference compared to CSP/S.
- LAP/S performance improved over the first three sessions, while CSP methods did not show significant improvement.
- LAP/S generated control signals more correlated with target location, with higher R-square values in later sessions.
Conclusions:
- A large EEG montage (40 channels) did not yield significantly better online BCI performance after the first session compared to a smaller montage (9 channels).
- The LAP/S method with a small EEG montage facilitated skill improvement across sessions.
- The CSP method showed limited improvement across sessions, irrespective of channel number.

