Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction01:14

NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction

1.1K
When magnetic nuclei in a sample achieve resonance and undergo relaxation, the signal detected in NMR is an approximately exponential free induction decay. Fourier transform of an exponential decay yields a Lorentzian peak in the frequency domain. Lorentzian peaks in an NMR spectrum are defined by their amplitude, full width at half maximum, and position, where the peak width is governed by the spin-spin relaxation time alone. In real experiments, however, the applied magnetic field is rendered...
1.1K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.7K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.7K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

12.5K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Parental Embodied Mentalizing Assessment<sup>TM</sup> as a function of parenting stress and emotion regulation difficulties: a comparative study between postpartum depressed and nondepressed mother-infant dyads.

BMC psychiatry·2026
Same author

When Cronbach's alpha does (not) indicate the reliability of domain-specific knowledge tests and why.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Strategizing AI utilization for psychological literature screening: A comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms and key factors to consider.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "The effects of mentalization and sensitivity of postpartum depression mothers after the circle of security-intensive intervention on the social-emotional development of three-year-old children" [J. Affect. Disord. 396 (1) (2026) 120838 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.120838 (1-10)].

Journal of affective disorders·2026
Same author

The effects of mentalization and sensitivity of postpartum depression mothers after the circle of security-intensive intervention on the social-emotional development of three-year-old children.

Journal of affective disorders·2025
Same author

Applying transformer models to psychological time-series data: A step-by-step tutorial with an empirical illustration of depression trajectories.

Psychological assessment·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.6K

A Computationally More Efficient and More Accurate Stepwise Approach for Correcting for Sampling Error and

Steffen Zitzmann1,2

  • 1a Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education.

Multivariate Behavioral Research
|May 22, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method to stabilize Level 2 (L2) covariance matrices in multilevel structural equation modeling (ML-SEM). This approach yields more accurate L2 regression coefficient estimates, especially with small sample sizes, improving multilevel analysis accuracy.

Keywords:
Multilevel modelingmaximum likelihoodstabilizationstepwise estimationstructural equation modeling

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.2K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

10.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.6K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.2K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

10.0K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Quantitative Psychology
  • Organizational Research

Background:

  • Multilevel structural equation modeling (ML-SEM) is widely used in social sciences for unbiased estimation.
  • Maximum Likelihood (ML) is the default estimation method in Mplus for ML-SEM.
  • ML can produce degenerate Level 2 (L2) covariance matrices, leading to inaccurate L2 regression coefficients with small sample sizes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel approach for stabilizing L2 covariance matrices in ML-SEM.
  • To improve the accuracy of L2 regression coefficient estimates.
  • To offer a more reliable method for researchers using ML-SEM with limited sample sizes.

Main Methods:

  • A simulation study was conducted to compare the proposed stabilization approach with standard ML estimation.
  • The proposed method focuses on stabilizing the L2 covariance matrices.
  • An empirical example from organizational research is used for illustration.

Main Results:

  • The proposed approach for stabilizing L2 covariance matrices yields more accurate estimates of L2 regression coefficients compared to standard ML.
  • This improved accuracy is particularly evident when dealing with small sample sizes at Level 2.
  • The simulation study provides evidence for the effectiveness of the stabilization technique.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method offers a valuable alternative for enhancing the precision of multilevel structural equation modeling.
  • Researchers can achieve more reliable estimates in their multilevel analyses by employing this covariance matrix stabilization technique.
  • This approach addresses a critical limitation of standard ML estimation in ML-SEM, particularly in data-limited scenarios.