Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

8.8K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
8.8K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

3.1K
3.1K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.7K
2.7K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.4K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.4K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

2.6K
2.6K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

995
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
995

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Representativeness and response validity across nine opt-in online samples.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Integrative experiments identify how punishment affects welfare in public goods games.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

How malicious AI swarms can threaten democracy.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

The levers of political persuasion with conversational artificial intelligence.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Persuading voters using human-artificial intelligence dialogues.

Nature·2025
Same author

Intuitive Thinking is Associated with Stronger Belief in Physiognomy and Confidence in the Accuracy of Facial Impressions.

Journal of nonverbal behavior·2025
Same journal

The decolonization of museums.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Contemporary antisemitism: Implications for cognitive behavioral therapy.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

On the politicization and polarization of psychology: What psychologists can learn from psychologists.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

An intergroup perspective on evolutionary scepticism.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Research on microaggressions and their impact assesses neither microaggressions nor their impact.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Racism in the science and practice of psychotherapy.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.7K

Cooperation and decision time.

Anthony M Evans1, David G Rand2

  • 1Tilburg University, The Netherlands.

Current Opinion in Psychology
|June 8, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Time pressure, favoring intuition, promotes cooperation. However, self-paced decisions show cooperation speed relates to decision conflict, not thinking style. Judgments about cooperation are influenced by decision speed.

More Related Videos

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.7K
A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.7K
Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.7K
A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Decision time is a crucial factor influencing social behavior.
  • Existing research explores the link between intuition, deliberation, and cooperation.
  • The relationship between decision speed and cooperation is complex and multifaceted.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and synthesize findings on the relationship between decision time and cooperation.
  • To differentiate the effects of experimentally manipulated versus self-paced decision times.
  • To explore the interpersonal consequences of decision time in cooperative contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Review of experimental studies manipulating decision time to assess intuition vs. deliberation.
  • Analysis of correlational studies examining self-paced decision times and cooperation.
  • Discussion of research on how decision time influences social judgments and predictions.

Main Results:

  • Experimental evidence indicates that time pressure, promoting intuition, generally favors cooperation.
  • Correlational studies suggest self-paced decision times are linked to decision conflict, not cognitive style.
  • Extreme cooperation decisions are faster than intermediate ones; relative speed varies by study design.

Conclusions:

  • Decision time impacts cooperation through distinct mechanisms depending on experimental control.
  • Intuition, induced by time pressure, facilitates cooperation, while self-paced decisions reflect conflict.
  • Decision speed serves as a social cue for judging and predicting cooperative behavior.