Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

A Cost Effective and Adaptable Scratch Migration Assay
Published on: June 30, 2020
Amalgam Alternatives: Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information Analysis
F Schwendicke1, G Göstemeyer1, M Stolpe2
11 Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Incrementally placed composites (IComp) are the most cost-effective amalgam alternative, offering longer tooth retention than bulk-fill composites (BComp) or glass ionomer cements (GIC). Further research on effectiveness could yield significant economic benefits for payers.
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Health economics
- Clinical dentistry
Background:
- Dental amalgam is a common restorative material.
- Alternatives like composites and glass ionomers are increasingly used.
- Assessing the long-term cost-effectiveness of these alternatives is crucial for healthcare systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of incrementally placed composites (IComp), bulk-fill composites (BComp), and glass ionomer cements (GIC) against amalgam.
- To determine the value of information (VOI) regarding the effectiveness of different restorative strategies.
- To adopt a mixed public-private-payer perspective within the German healthcare context.
Main Methods:
- Bayesian network meta-analyses were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of failure for each material.
- A lifetime Markov model followed 30-year-old patients with 3-surfaced molar restorations.
- Monte Carlo microsimulations estimated cost-effectiveness, cost-effectiveness acceptability, and VOI.
Main Results:
- IComp proved most effective (41.9 years tooth retention) and least costly (2,076 euros) over a lifetime, dominating BComp and GIC.
- BComp and GIC were initially less costly but had higher failure rates and long-term costs.
- The VOI was substantial (3.99 euros per restoration), indicating potential annual savings of 87.8 million euros for payers.
Conclusions:
- Initial cost savings from BComp/GIC are likely offset by higher failure and retreatment costs compared to IComp.
- Composite inlays (CompI) and incrementally placed bulk-fills (IBComp) were not found to be cost-effective.
- All assessed alternatives appear inferior to amalgam, but further research on effectiveness is warranted due to considerable VOI.
Related Concept Videos
Alternative RNA Splicing
There are five types of alternative RNA splicing that vary in the ways the pre-mRNA segments are removed or retained in the mature mRNA. The first...
Alternative RNA Splicing
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
Electric Generator: Alternator
The magnetic flux passing through the coil varies sinusoidally as the loop rotates inside the magnetic field. This...
Buffer Effectiveness
The buffer capacity is the amount of acid or base that can be added to a given volume...
Framing Effects

