Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.5K
Bystander Effect02:09

Bystander Effect

10.3K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
10.3K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.5K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.5K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

7.1K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
7.1K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

46.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.2K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

17.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
17.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Increasing conflict between intuitions triggers deliberation.

Cognition·2026
Same author

A single process for deductive and inductive inference? Examining the impact of conclusion typicality and argument validity on immediate inferences.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Fast reasoning uses semantic activation as an intuitive cue.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

How malicious AI swarms can threaten democracy.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Is Overconfidence a Trait? An Adversarial Collaboration.

Psychological science·2025
Same author

Persuading voters using human-artificial intelligence dialogues.

Nature·2025
Same journal

Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.6K

Do smart people have better intuitions?

Valerie A Thompson, Gordon Pennycook1, Dries Trippas2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Yale University.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|July 6, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

High-capacity reasoners excel due to intuitive (Type I) processes, not just deliberate thinking. Statistical information can interfere with belief judgments for these individuals, highlighting the role of intuition in reasoning capacity.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques
07:52

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.5K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.6K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques
07:52

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.5K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Human Reasoning

Background:

  • High-capacity reasoners typically outperform others, attributed to deliberate (Type II) thinking.
  • Existing research focuses on the role of conscious reasoning in cognitive differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the hypothesis that intuitive (Type I) processes differentiate high- and low-capacity reasoners.
  • To explore the influence of intuitive versus belief-based judgments on reasoning performance.

Main Methods:

  • A Stroop Task-like reasoning challenge was employed.
  • Participants (N=336) completed deductive reasoning and base rate tasks.
  • Tasks involved judgments based on logic/statistics versus beliefs/stereotypes, with some participants under time pressure.

Main Results:

  • High-capacity reasoners showed better performance with logic/statistics over beliefs when conflicting.
  • Low-capacity reasoners favored belief judgments over logic/statistics when conflicting.
  • These patterns held across task types and deadlines, suggesting intuitive processes influence performance.

Conclusions:

  • Intuitive (Type I) processes play a significant role in differentiating reasoning abilities.
  • Statistical information may be more intuitive than belief-based information for high-capacity reasoners.
  • The accuracy-capacity relationship in reasoning is partly explained by intuitive cognitive processes.