Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 8, 2026

06:11
High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
Published on: September 26, 2025
750
Is Overconfidence a Trait? An Adversarial Collaboration
Jabin Binnendyk1, Sophia Li2, Thomas Costello3
1Department of Psychology, Cornell University.
Psychological Science
|December 16, 2025
Summary
Overconfidence may be a genuine psychological trait. New research using novel tasks with ostensibly random performance suggests consistent individual differences in confidence, supporting the trait hypothesis.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- The nature of overconfidence, specifically whether it is a psychological trait, remains a subject of scholarly debate.
- Previous research has faced challenges in isolating overconfidence from task-specific performance factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether overconfidence can be reliably measured as a psychological trait.
- To address the scholarly dispute regarding the fundamental nature of overconfidence.
Main Methods:
- An adversarial collaboration between two research teams with preregistered analyses and predictions.
- Development of novel tasks with ostensibly random performance to measure trait overconfidence without task-related confounds.
- Study involved 942 U.S. adults, with data collected via CloudConnect.
Main Results:
- Robust relationships in confidence were found across novel tasks, as indicated by confirmatory factor analyses and raw correlations.
- Findings suggest that individuals exhibit consistent beliefs about their performance capabilities even when performance is random.
- Evidence supports the existence of trait overconfidence.
Conclusions:
- The study provides support for the claim that overconfidence may function as a genuine psychological trait.
- Methodological innovation in measuring confidence on random-performance tasks offers a new avenue for trait assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Serving Bias
185
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
185
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
189
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
189
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
43.4K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
43.4K
Hindsight Biases
4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
4.2K
Correspondence Bias
171
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
171

