Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Automated Gel Size Selection to Improve the Quality of Next-generation Sequencing Libraries Prepared from Environmental Water Samples
Published on: April 17, 2015
[Information specialists improve the quality of systematic reviews]
Lorna Wildgaard1, Jeanne Vendt, Kim Wildgaard
1Kim.Wildgaard@regionh.dk.
Abstract:
Systematic reviews (SR) are a recognised standard for synthesising clinical data in order to support evidence-based clinical decisions. A robust search strategy is the core of an SR, requiring theoretical and methodological considerations in the pre-, intra- and post-search stage. This review discusses the competencies necessary to design a search including the necessary symbiosis between medical knowledge and detailed knowledge of database architecture and corresponding semantics. Information specialists play an important role in high-quality SR.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Random and Systematic Errors
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...

