Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

14:32
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
24.9K
Revisiting the need for a literature search narrative: A brief methodological note
Chris Cooper1, Sarah Dawson2, Jaime Peters3
1Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Group, University of York, York, UK.
Research Synthesis Methods
|July 22, 2018
Summary
Should systematic reviews include a search narrative? This method note suggests adding a search narrative to primary search strategies could improve peer review, stakeholder engagement, and transparency in literature searching.
Area of Science:
- Information Science
- Systematic Review Methodology
Background:
- Systematic reviews rely heavily on comprehensive literature searches.
- The transparency and reproducibility of literature searches are critical for review validity.
- Current methods for reporting literature searches may lack sufficient detail for thorough peer review.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose the inclusion of a search narrative alongside primary search strategies in systematic reviews.
- To explore the potential benefits of search narratives for peer review and stakeholder engagement.
- To enhance the transparency of decision-making processes in literature searching.
Main Methods:
- This is a method note, not an empirical study.
- The authors propose a conceptual framework for a search narrative.
- The note discusses the potential advantages and implications of implementing search narratives.
Main Results:
- A search narrative could provide a conceptual and contextual report on the search strategy.
- This approach may benefit the peer review of literature searches.
- Increased engagement with and discussion of search strategies from various users is anticipated.
Conclusions:
- Search narratives can enhance the transparency of decision-making in literature searching.
- Integrating search narratives may improve the quality and understanding of systematic review searches.
- This methodological suggestion aims to foster greater scrutiny and dialogue around literature search strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Response Surface Methodology
668
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
668
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
56.1K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
56.1K
Self-Schemas
36.4K
In general, a schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
36.4K
Hindsight Biases
4.3K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
4.3K
Confirmation Biases
8.3K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.3K

