Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Assessment of Age-related Changes in Cognitive Functions Using EmoCogMeter, a Novel Tablet-computer Based Approach
Published on: February 14, 2014
Investigating ToM in aging with the MASC: from accuracy to error type
Serena Lecce1, Irene Ceccato1, Elena Cavallini1
1a Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences , University of Pavia , Pavia , Italy.
Older adults show declines in Theory of Mind (ToM) compared to younger adults, particularly in real-life scenarios. The Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC) effectively measures these age-related changes in mental state attribution.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Gerontology
Background:
- Theory of Mind (ToM) is crucial for social cognition.
- Evidence suggests ToM declines with normal aging.
- Traditional ToM tasks may not reflect real-world social cognition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate age-related differences in ToM using a dynamic, real-world social cognition task.
- To compare the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC) with a classic ToM task in aging.
- To analyze error types in mental state attribution across age groups.
Main Methods:
- Administered the MASC and the Strange Stories task to young, young-old, and old-old adults.
- Assessed cognitive functioning.
- Analyzed accuracy and typology of errors (hyper-ToM, hypo-ToM, no-ToM).
Main Results:
- Older adults were less accurate on the MASC than young adults, but not on the Strange Stories.
- Older adults made more hypo- and no-ToM errors; young adults made more hyper-ToM errors.
- Older adults showed equal frequencies of hyper- and hypo-ToM errors, unlike younger adults.
Conclusions:
- The MASC is a sensitive measure for detecting ToM deficits in aging.
- Age-related ToM impairments may stem from both under- and over-mentalization.
- Classic ToM tasks might not fully capture the complexities of social cognition in older adults.
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Improving Translational Accuracy
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Fundamental Attribution Error

