Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Normothermic Ex Vivo Pancreas Perfusion for the Preservation of Pancreas Allografts before Transplantation
Published on: July 27, 2022
Identifiability Analysis of Three Control-Oriented Models for Use in Artificial Pancreas Systems
Jose Garcia-Tirado1, Christian Zuluaga-Bedoya2, Marc D Breton1
11 Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Identifiability analysis of glucose control models for type 1 diabetes (T1D) reveals that insulin sensitivity is not the most influential parameter. SOGMM and ICING models show better performance and parameter stability than MMC for artificial pancreas applications.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Control Systems Theory
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Type 1 diabetes (T1D) management requires accurate glucose control models.
- Existing control-oriented models for T1D glucose control include SOGMM, ICING, and MMC.
- Model identifiability is crucial for reliable glucose control and artificial pancreas development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the structural and practical identifiability of three common control-oriented glucose control models for T1D.
- To evaluate the parameter influence and identify key parameters for model accuracy.
- To compare the performance and parameter variability of SOGMM, ICING, and MMC models.
Main Methods:
- Structural identifiability analysis using generating series (GS) and identifiability tableaus.
- Practical identifiability assessment via sensitivity analysis, Latin hypercube sampling (LHS), and collinearity analysis.
- Model identification using continuous glucose monitor (CGM), insulin pump, and meal records from T1D patients (n=5).
- Performance evaluation using root mean square (RMS) error.
Main Results:
- Identifiable parameter sets were established for all models.
- Insulin sensitivity was found not to be the most dynamically influential parameter, contrary to prior assumptions.
- Models showed comparable performance (RMS ~20 mg/dl), but MMC failed for one patient and exhibited higher parameter variability.
- SOGMM and ICING demonstrated better performance and parameter stability than MMC.
Conclusions:
- Both structural and practical identifiability analyses are essential before model identification/individualization in T1D.
- While all models represent CGM data, their suitability for artificial pancreas systems varies.
- SOGMM and ICING are more promising than MMC due to performance and parameter stability, though ICING's large parameter set poses overfitting risks.
Related Concept Videos
Control Systems
At the heart...
Control Systems: Applications
In modern vehicles, control systems manage various functions to enhance performance and safety. The steering wheel and accelerator are primary inputs in a car's control system. The...
Feedback control systems
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
Open and closed-loop control systems
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
Transfer Function in Control Systems
To derive the transfer function, consider a general nth-order linear time-invariant...
Pancreas
The broad head of the pancreas lies within the loop formed by the duodenum, while its slender body reaches towards the spleen. The tail of the pancreas is short...

