Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Governance of Academic Health Centers and Systems: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis
Vincent D Pellegrini1, David S Guzick, Donald E Wilson
1V.D. Pellegrini Jr is John A. Siegling Professor and chair, Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, director, Integrated Center of Clinical Excellence, Musculoskeletal Institute of MUSC Health, and adjunct professor, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Charleston, South Carolina. D.S. Guzick is senior vice president for health affairs and president, UF Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. D.E. Wilson is John Z. and Akiko K. Bowers Distinguished Professor and dean emeritus, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, and senior vice president for health sciences, emeritus, Howard University, Washington, DC. C.M. Evarts is distinguished university professor and former senior vice president for health affairs and CEO, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, and former senior vice president for health affairs and dean, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Abstract:
Health care has evolved from a cottage industry to a very complex one constituting nearly one-fifth of the U.S. economy. Large aggregated health care systems have evolved primarily for the purpose of optimizing financial performance by capturing greater market share and taking advantage of economies of scale in care delivery. With the noble intent of providing a broader base of support for the academic mission, academic health centers (AHCs) have followed suit by partnering with community hospitals and organizations with variable prior experience in the education and research arenas. Such a strategy makes good business sense, but it creates challenges for the academic mission. Singular emphasis on physicians' clinical productivity enhances financial margin but often reduces faculty time and effort dedicated to the academic mission. While individual AHC governance is varied, the leadership structure of large aggregated health systems built around an AHC is even more complex and heterogeneous. Yet, to ensure the prosperity of the academic mission, the governance structure of such health care systems is of critical importance. Preservation of academic oversight of the faculty practice plan, a unifying central focal point of organizational decision making, and genuine physician leadership are three overarching governance characteristics that strengthen the prosperity of the academic mission within large aggregated health systems. Despite the heterogeneous nature of academic health system governance, these critical components of organizational leadership structure facilitate support of a robust academic mission. Understanding these principles and objectives of governance is essential for critical faculty engagement in AHC leadership activities.
Related Concept Videos
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Center of Gravity
Center of Gravity
To determine its location, the principle of moments can be utilized by dividing the object into...
Center of Mass
The knowledge of the center of mass can also help us to describe and predict the motion of objects. For example, when a ball is thrown...
Bioavailability Enhancement: Determination and Conceptual Approaches in Overcoming Bioavailability Problems
Physical Principles Governing Gas Exchange
Gas Laws Governing Respiration
The behavior of gases is guided by Dalton's Law of partial pressures and Henry's Law.
Dalton's Law asserts that the total...

