Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A peer evaluation for measuring team teaching effectiveness.

F Rabada-Rice, R S Scott

    The Journal of Nursing Education
    |June 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Detecting episomal or integrated human papillomavirus 16 DNA using an exonuclease V-qPCR-based assay.

    Virology·2019
    Same author

    Inhibition of Epstein-Barr Virus Replication in Human Papillomavirus-Immortalized Keratinocytes.

    Journal of virology·2018
    Same author

    Epstein-Barr virus in the pathogenesis of oral cancers.

    Oral diseases·2017
    Same author

    The interaction between human papillomavirus and other viruses.

    Virus research·2016
    Same author

    A need to know.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Hypertriglyceridaemia with acitretin use: a proposal for its management in the context of overall cardiovascular risk.

    The British journal of dermatology·2014
    Same journal

    Should We Keep or Remove Outliers?

    The Journal of nursing education·2026
    Same journal

    Truth.

    The Journal of nursing education·2026
    Same journal

    AI Utilization and Clinical Judgment: Predictors of Caring Behavior Among Nursing Students.

    The Journal of nursing education·2026
    Same journal

    Mental Health Nursing Simulation to Develop the Therapeutic Use of Self.

    The Journal of nursing education·2026
    Same journal

    Cultivating Clinical Judgment Through Wound Building: A Teaching Innovation.

    The Journal of nursing education·2026
    Same journal

    Pathophysiology as a Predictor of Success in a Prelicensure Undergraduate Nursing Program.

    The Journal of nursing education·2026
    See all related articles

    A new peer evaluation tool aids team teaching assessment. Effective use requires evaluator familiarity and observation, supporting faculty growth and comprehensive evaluations.

    Area of Science:

    • Educational Assessment
    • Faculty Development
    • Team Teaching Methodologies

    Background:

    • Comprehensive evaluation procedures require robust data collection methods.
    • Assessing team teaching effectiveness presents unique challenges.
    • Existing evaluation tools may not adequately capture collaborative teaching dynamics.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To introduce a novel peer evaluation tool specifically designed for team teaching.
    • To provide a structured instrument for gathering data on collaborative teaching practices.
    • To enhance the comprehensive evaluation of faculty involved in team teaching.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a peer evaluation tool with defined criteria.
    • Criteria framed as performance objectives for clear assessment.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of the tool by evaluators familiar with the criteria and observed performance.
  • Main Results:

    • The tool effectively supplies data for the team teaching component of evaluations.
    • Optimal use is achieved with evaluator familiarity and extended observation.
    • Facilitates yearly evaluation of non-tenured faculty and promotion/tenure candidates.

    Conclusions:

    • The peer evaluation tool is a valuable instrument for assessing team teaching.
    • It supports faculty self-evaluation and professional development.
    • Enhances the rigor and fairness of faculty performance reviews in collaborative settings.