Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sex-linked Disorders01:43

Sex-linked Disorders

109.0K
Like autosomes, sex chromosomes contain a variety of genes necessary for normal body function. When a mutation in one of these genes results in biological deficits, the disorder is considered sex-linked.
109.0K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.4K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.8K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.8K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K
Equation of Motion: General Plane motion01:22

Equation of Motion: General Plane motion

585
In the context of a rigid body's movement within a general plane, it is important to understand that this motion is typically triggered by external forces or couple moments exerted onto it. This principle can be explained through Newton's second law, which stipulates the translational motion of the body's center of mass along each axis.
Moreover, the body's center of mass experiences a rotational effect as a result of these couple moments. This rotation can be articulated as the...
585

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The neural mechanisms of aligning spatial perspectives.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Altered aperiodic EEG spectral power during speech perception task is associated with verbal communication in youths with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Dissociating mechanisms of spatial suppression and summation in human visual cortical regions MT/V5: a transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) study and clinical implications.

International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

Center-Surround Processing in Psychosis.

Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging·2026
Same author

The effect of unilateral cortical blindness on lane position and gaze behavior in a virtual reality steering task.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Cognitively-Inspired Tokens Overcome Egocentric Bias in Multimodal Models.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Increased rates of hybridization in swordtails are associated with water pollution.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Visual uncertainty and task demands shape active sensing strategies in mice.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

An adaptable, self-organizing, single-cell morphology circuit optimizes suctorian predatory trap structure.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Temporal tuning of switch-like virulence expression resolves environmental uncertainty through phenotypic heterogeneity.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

An abstract relational map emerges in the human medial prefrontal cortex with consolidation.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Phloem evolved gradually and asynchronously to xylem in early vascular plants.

Current biology : CB·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia
08:32

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia

Published on: October 25, 2016

13.9K

Sex Differences in Visual Motion Processing.

Scott O Murray1, Michael-Paul Schallmo2, Tamar Kolodny1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA.

Current Biology : CB
|August 21, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Males perceive visual motion direction faster than females, with shorter motion duration thresholds. This significant sex difference in perception was replicated across studies and is not explained by general visual or motor abilities.

Keywords:
MT+fMRImotion perceptionsex differencesvisual perception

More Related Videos

Visualizing Motion Patterns in Acupuncture Manipulation
08:18

Visualizing Motion Patterns in Acupuncture Manipulation

Published on: July 16, 2016

9.2K
In Vitro Method to Study Sex-Based Differences in Conjunctival Goblet Cells
06:28

In Vitro Method to Study Sex-Based Differences in Conjunctival Goblet Cells

Published on: July 28, 2023

853

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia
08:32

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia

Published on: October 25, 2016

13.9K
Visualizing Motion Patterns in Acupuncture Manipulation
08:18

Visualizing Motion Patterns in Acupuncture Manipulation

Published on: July 16, 2016

9.2K
In Vitro Method to Study Sex-Based Differences in Conjunctival Goblet Cells
06:28

In Vitro Method to Study Sex-Based Differences in Conjunctival Goblet Cells

Published on: July 28, 2023

853

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Perception Psychology
  • Human Biology

Background:

  • Sex as a biological variable is increasingly recognized in neuroscience research.
  • Conditions like autism spectrum disorder (ASD) exhibit sex biases, with higher male prevalence.
  • Previous research indicates sex-based neural differences influencing cognitive and perceptual tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate potential sex differences in visual motion perception among neurotypical adults.
  • To determine if motion duration thresholds, a measure of motion perception, differ between males and females.
  • To explore the neural underpinnings of observed sex differences using fMRI.

Main Methods:

  • Recruited 263 neurotypical adult participants across three independent laboratories.
  • Measured motion duration thresholds, the minimum time to perceive motion direction.
  • Utilized functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to assess human MT+ responsiveness.

Main Results:

  • Males exhibited significantly shorter motion duration thresholds than females, indicating enhanced motion perception.
  • This sex difference was robust and replicated across all participating laboratories.
  • No differences in MT+ fMRI response magnitudes were found between sexes, despite correlations with individual performance.

Conclusions:

  • A notable sex difference exists in visual motion perception, with males performing better.
  • This enhanced performance in males is not attributable to general visual processing speed or motor skills.
  • Neural measures like MT+ fMRI may not fully capture sex differences in perceptual tasks, underscoring the need to consider sex as a biological variable in research design and analysis.