Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Quantification of Plasmid-Mediated Antibiotic Resistance in an Experimental Evolution Approach
Published on: December 14, 2019
Screening for Anthrax Postexposure Antibiotic Prophylaxis-The New York City Approach.
Mark Misener1, David T Starr1, Allison J Scaccia1
1Mark Misener, MD, is Field Operations Medical Specialist; David T. Starr, MIA, is Assistant Commissioner, Bureau of Emergency Field Operations; and Allison J. Scaccia, NP, is Director, Clinical Planning Unit; all in the Office of Emergency Preparedness and Response, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Long Island City, New York. Vibhuti Arya, PharmD, is Associate Clinical Professor, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, New York.
Public health authorities must standardize antibiotic selection for anthrax postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) to ensure consistent treatment and maintain public trust during an event. This study details New York City
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Infectious Disease Control
- Emergency Preparedness
Background:
- Antibiotic postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) is crucial for preventing inhalation anthrax after exposure to Bacillus anthracis (B. anthracis) spores.
- Public health authorities manage PEP dispensing during anthrax events using screening algorithms.
- Current algorithms vary significantly between jurisdictions, leading to inconsistent antibiotic recommendations for individuals with similar exposure profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the inconsistency in antibiotic PEP selection across different jurisdictions.
- To present New York City's specific screening algorithm, planning assumptions, and rationale for question selection.
- To encourage standardization of PEP screening algorithms and public messaging to enhance public health response confidence.
Main Methods:
- Development and refinement of a standardized screening algorithm for antibiotic PEP.
- Detailed rationale for inclusion and exclusion of specific screening questions.
- Comparative analysis of New York City's algorithm against those used in other jurisdictions.
Main Results:
- Significant variability identified in screening questions and antibiotic dispensing decisions among jurisdictions.
- New York City's algorithm aims to standardize antibiotic selection based on clinical appropriateness.
- Exclusion of certain screening questions by other jurisdictions based on relevance and potential for confusion.
Conclusions:
- Inconsistent antibiotic PEP protocols can erode public and professional confidence in public health responses.
- Standardization of screening algorithms and dispensing practices is essential for a unified and effective anthrax response.
- Adoption of refined, evidence-based algorithms can improve the reliability and equity of PEP distribution.
Related Concept Videos
Antibiotic Selection
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Information Processing Approach

