Personalised fish intake recommendations: the effect of background exposure on optimisation
Maria Persson1, Sisse Fagt1, Maarten J Nauta1
1Division of Diet,Disease Prevention and Toxicology,National Food Institute,Technical University of Denmark,2800 Kgs.Lyngby,Denmark.
The British Journal of Nutrition
|September 1, 2018
Summary
Personalized fish intake recommendations improve adherence by considering individual preferences and background nutrient/contaminant exposure. Over half of Danish adults need to increase fish consumption for optimal EPA, DHA, and vitamin D levels.
Area of Science:
- Nutritional science
- Public health
- Environmental health
Background:
- National dietary guidelines often fail to align with individual consumption patterns and preferences.
- Personalized dietary recommendations, derived via mathematical optimization, show potential for improved adherence.
- Accurate recommendations require consideration of background exposure to nutrients and contaminants from various sources.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact of individual background exposure variations on personalized fish intake recommendations.
- To model fish intake that balances nutritional benefits (EPA, DHA, vitamin D) with contaminant risks (methyl mercury, dioxins).
Main Methods:
- Utilized a quadratic programming model to generate personalized fish intake recommendations.
- Incorporated individual food intake, body weight, and background exposures (environmental and dietary) for 3016 Danish adults.
- Ensured recommendations met nutrient requirements while staying within tolerable contaminant exposure limits.
Main Results:
- Lower nutrient constraints were critical for a significant portion of the study population.
- 55% of the analyzed Danish adults were advised to increase their fish intake.
- Modeled fish intake recommendations demonstrated particular sensitivity to vitamin D background exposure.
Conclusions:
- Individualized dietary recommendations, accounting for background exposures, are crucial for optimizing health outcomes.
- A substantial segment of the population requires increased fish consumption to meet essential nutrient targets.
- Vitamin D background exposure significantly influences personalized fish intake recommendations.
Related Concept Videos
Osmoregulation in Fishes
53.1K
When cells are placed in a hypotonic (low-salt) fluid, they can swell and burst. Meanwhile, cells in a hypertonic solution—with a higher salt concentration—can shrivel and die. How do fish cells avoid these gruesome fates in hypotonic freshwater or hypertonic seawater environments?
53.1K
Regulation of Water Intake
2.8K
Osmolality refers to the number of solute particles per kilogram of solvent in a solution. Plasma osmolality specifically indicates the total number of solute particles per kilogram of water in blood plasma. This value reflects the body's hydration status and is tightly regulated through mechanisms controlling water intake and output. While water consumption is a conscious decision, the body has intrinsic regulatory systems to maintain fluid balance. Dehydration, a state of water deficit...
2.8K
Regulation of Food Intake
2.9K
Short-term regulation of food intake primarily involves neural signals from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, blood nutrient levels, and GI tract hormones. Communication between the gut and brain via vagal nerve fibers plays a significant role in evaluating the contents of the gut. Clinical studies have shown that protein ingestion produces a more prolonged response in these nerve fibers compared to an equivalent amount of glucose. Additionally, the activation of stretch receptors caused by GI...
2.9K
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
7.7K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
7.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
8.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.4K
FISH - Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization
24.5K
Fluorescence in situ hybridization, or FISH, was developed in the early 1980s and has quickly become one of the most widely used techniques in cytogenetics. Labeled probes are used to bind complementary DNA or RNA sequences on a chromosome or in a region within a cell. Earlier, the probes could only be obtained by cloning or reverse transcription of a DNA template. Currently, the probe oligonucleotides can be synthesized synthetically. Additionally, with the advancement of optical techniques,...
24.5K


