Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Improved Knowledge Following an Interprofessional Interpreter-Use Training
Celia Pechak1, Connie Summers, Joanna Velasco
1DPT Program, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University Ave., El Paso, TX 79968, USA. Tel 915-747-7289, fax 915-747-8211. cmpechak@utep.edu.
Introduction:
Language barriers between patients and their healthcare providers are associated with negative outcomes. One approach to bridge language discordance is to offer interpreter-use training. This study's purpose was to evaluate the effects of an interprofessional interpreter-use training on speech-language pathology (SLP), doctor of physical therapy (DPT), and master of occupational therapy (MOT) students.
Methods:
Seventy-one students (18 SLP, 32 DPT, and 21 MOT) participated. Participants first completed an online module and then participated in a 3-hour interprofessional training consisting of lecture, role-play, and reflection. Each completed an interpreter-use knowledge assessment and the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) before and after training and a program evaluation. A subsample participated in focus groups and completed the interpreter-use knowledge assessment and RIPLS 5 months later.
Results:
The participants improved in interpreter-use knowledge and self-assessed readiness for interprofessional learning, and they maintained these gains at follow-up. Themes included new interpreter knowledge, ethical practice, and new interprofessional knowledge.
Conclusion:
The training was completed in a short period of time at no financial cost, possibly making the structure feasible for other educators to duplicate. A unique element of our training was the semi-structured reflection questions highlighting ethical complexities related to serving as untrained interpreters for others.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Interpreting R Charts
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Interpreting Run Charts
Mass Spectrum: Interpretation
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

