Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Using a Knee Arthrometer to Evaluate Tissue-specific Contributions to Knee Flexion Contracture in the Rat
Published on: November 9, 2018
Articular-surface-based automatic anatomical coordinate systems for the knee bones
Jean-Baptiste Renault1, Gaëtan Aüllo-Rasser2, Mathias Donnez3
1Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, ISM UMR 7287, 13009 Marseille, France; APHM, Institute for Locomotion, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Sainte-Marguerite Hospital, 13009 Marseille, France.
Abstract:
Increasing use of patient-specific surgical procedures in orthopaedics means that patient-specific anatomical coordinate systems (ACSs) need to be determined. For knee bones, automatic algorithms constructing ACSs exist and are assumed to be more reliable than manual methods, although both approaches are based on non-unique numerical reconstructions of true bone geometries. Furthermore, determining the best algorithms is difficult, as algorithms are evaluated on different datasets. Thus, in this study, we developed 3 algorithms, each with 3 variants, and compared them with 5 from the literature on a dataset comprising 24 lower-limb CT-scans. To evaluate algorithms' sensitivity to the operator-dependent reconstruction procedure, the tibia, patella and femur of each CT-scan were each reconstructed once by three different operators. Our algorithms use principal inertia axis (PIA), cross-sectional area, surface normal orientations and curvature data to identify the bone region underneath articular surfaces (ASs). Then geometric primitives are fitted to ASs, and the ACSs are constructed from the geometric primitive points and/or axes. For each bone type, the algorithm displaying the least inter-operator variability is identified. The best femur algorithm fits a cylinder to posterior condyle ASs and a sphere to the femoral head, average axis deviations: 0.12°, position differences: 0.20 mm. The best patella algorithm identifies the AS PIAs, average axis deviations: 0.91°, position differences: 0.19 mm. The best tibia algorithm finds the ankle AS center and the 1st PIA of a layer around a plane fitted to condyle ASs, average axis deviations: 0.38°, position differences: 0.27 mm.
More Related Videos
07:10Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of the Knee in Aged Dunkin-Hartley Guinea Pigs after Intra Articular Injection
Published on: August 2, 2024
05:04A Non-Invasive Method for Generating the Cyclic Loading-Induced Intra-Articular Cartilage Lesion Model of the Rat Knee
Published on: July 5, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Vector Transformation in Rotating Coordinate Systems
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Coordination Number and Geometry
Coordination Compounds and Nomenclature
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Knee Joint
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris...