Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Transmembrane Protein Family-Related Markers in Gastric Cancer and Implications for Targeted Therapies
Published on: September 15, 2023
Optimizing cancer immunotherapy: Is it time for personalized predictive biomarkers?
Milena Music1, Ioannis Prassas2, Eleftherios P Diamandis1,2,3,4
1a Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada.
Cancer immunotherapy, a treatment that selectively augments a patient's anti-tumor immune response, is a breakthrough advancement in personalized medicine. A subset of cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy have displayed robust and long-lasting therapeutic responses. Currently, the spotlight is on the use of blocking antibodies against the T-cell checkpoint molecules, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), which have been effectively used to combat many cancers types. Despite the overall enthusiasm, immune checkpoint blockade inhibitors suffer from significant limitations such as high cost, serious toxicity in a substantial proportion of patients, and a response rate as low as 10%-40% in some clinical trials. Consequently, there is an urgent and unmet medical need for companion biomarkers that could both predict the response of individual patients to these therapies, and provide the means for precise monitoring of their therapeutic outcome. In this era of precision medicine, predictive biomarkers are a hot commodity because they can effectively separate responders from non-responders, and spare non-responders from serious therapy-related toxicity. Emerging predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint blockade are: PD-L1 expression, increased amounts of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, increased mutational load and mismatch repair deficiency. Other well-studied biomarkers include inflammatory infiltrate, absolute lymphocyte count and lactate dehydrogenase levels. We review recent progress on predictive cancer biomarkers in immunotherapy, with a special emphasis on serum autoantibodies that have the potential to be personalized for optimal clinical outcomes.
Cancer immunotherapy, a treatment that selectively augments a patient's anti-tumor immune response, is a breakthrough advancement in personalized medicine. A subset of cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy have displayed robust and long-lasting therapeutic responses. Currently, the spotlight is on the use of blocking antibodies against the T-cell checkpoint molecules, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), which have been effectively used to combat many cancers types. Despite the overall enthusiasm, immune checkpoint blockade inhibitors suffer from significant limitations such as high cost, serious toxicity in a substantial proportion of patients, and a response rate as low as 10%-40% in some clinical trials. Consequently, there is an urgent and unmet medical need for companion biomarkers that could both predict the response of individual patients to these therapies, and provide the means for precise monitoring of their therapeutic outcome. In this era of precision medicine, predictive biomarkers are a hot commodity because they can effectively separate responders from non-responders, and spare non-responders from serious therapy-related toxicity. Emerging predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint blockade are: PD-L1 expression, increased amounts of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, increased mutational load and mismatch repair deficiency. Other well-studied biomarkers include inflammatory infiltrate, absolute lymphocyte count and lactate dehydrogenase levels. We review recent progress on predictive cancer biomarkers in immunotherapy, with a special emphasis on serum autoantibodies that have the potential to be personalized for optimal clinical outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Optimal Foraging
Personal Identity
Optimization Problems

