Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

3D Printing of Biomolecular Models for Research and Pedagogy
Published on: March 13, 2017
Comparing retainers constructed on conventional stone models and on 3D printed models: a randomized crossover
Norhidayah Mohd Tahir1, Wan Nurazreena Wan Hassan1,2, Roslan Saub3
1Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers (VFRs) made using 3D printed models offer comparable patient satisfaction and post-treatment stability to those made from traditional stone models. This 3D printing approach in orthodontics provides equivalent outcomes for oral health-related quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Dental Technology
Background:
- Traditional vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers (VFRs) are fabricated on stone models.
- Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology offers a potential alternative for model fabrication.
- Evaluating the clinical efficacy and patient experience of VFRs made from 3D printed models is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare VFRs constructed on conventional stone models (VFR-CV) versus 3D printed models (VFR-3D).
- To assess patient-reported outcomes, specifically oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).
- To evaluate post-treatment dental stability using Little's Irregularity Index (LII).
Main Methods:
- A crossover, randomized controlled trial design was employed.
- VFRs were fabricated on both stone and 3D printed acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) models.
- OHRQoL was measured using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire.
- Post-treatment stability was assessed using LII.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were found in OHRQoL or LII between VFR-CV and VFR-3D retainers.
- Both groups reported significant improvements in OHRQoL after the initial intervention.
- While one group showed a slight increase in LII, overall stability was comparable between the two retainer types.
Conclusions:
- 3D printed models can be effectively used for fabricating VFRs without compromising patient OHRQoL.
- The use of 3D printed models for VFR fabrication demonstrates comparable post-treatment stability to conventional methods.
- This study supports the integration of 3D printing in orthodontic retainer manufacturing.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Building Stone
Igneous rocks are formed from the solidification of magma or lava. An example is granite, known for its durability and resistance to weathering, making it ideal for parts of...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Quarrying of Stone
One common method involves using a diamond belt saw to cut large blocks from the quarry face. These blocks can be about 50 feet long and 12 feet high. After the initial vertical cut, drilling is performed at the base of the...
Stone Masonry
Molecular Models
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

