Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pathogen Detection and Disease Assessment in Real-Time Using M-ROSE
Published on: March 1, 2024
An Evaluation of the IOLMaster 700
Mark A Bullimore1, Stephen Slade, Paul Yoo
1Southern California College of Optometry (M.A.B.), Marshall B. Ketchum University, Fullerton, CA; College of Optometry (M.A.B.), The University of Houston, Houston, TX; Slade and Baker Vision Center (S.S.), Houston, TX; and Carl Zeiss Meditec (P.Y., T.O.), Dublin, CA.
Objectives:
To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the Carl Zeiss Meditec IOLMaster 700, which uses swept-source optical coherence tomography technology, along with its agreement with the IOLMaster 500 and Lenstar LS 900.
Methods:
In a clinical practice, complete measurements were taken on one eye of 100 subjects: 51 with cataracts and 49 with clear lenses. Three sets of measurements were taken by 3 operators with three different IOLMaster 700 units, and one operator took 3 measurements with the IOLMaster 500 and the Lenstar. A random-effects model of analysis of variance was used to estimate the repeatability and reproducibility. The 95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) were calculated for all comparisons.
Results:
Comparing the IOLMaster 700 and IOLMaster 500 in cataract patients, 95% LoA were -0.01 to +0.06 mm for axial length, -0.44 to +0.27 D for corneal power, and -0.18 to +0.17 mm for anterior chamber depth. Comparing the IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar for corneal thickness and lens thickness yielded 95% LoA of -4 to +13 μm and -0.26 to +0.41 mm, respectively. The repeatability and reproducibility limits for the IOLMaster 700 were ±0.014 and ±0.023 mm for axial length; ±0.26 and ±0.27 D for corneal power; ±7 and ±11 μm for corneal thickness; ±0.02 and ±0.02 mm for anterior chamber depth; and ±0.02 and ±0.05 mm for lens thickness, respectively.
Conclusions:
There was good agreement between the IOLMaster 700 and comparator instruments and superior or equivalent precision. Some differences were noted, but not considered clinically meaningful.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Nursing Evaluation
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation
Evaluating Limits by Direct Substitution

