Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.2K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.2K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.3K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.3K
Genomics02:02

Genomics

40.7K
Genomics is the science of genomes: it is the study of all the genetic material of an organism. In humans, the genome consists of information carried in 23 pairs of chromosomes in the nucleus, as well as mitochondrial DNA. In genomics, both coding and non-coding DNA is sequenced and analyzed. Genomics allows a better understanding of all living things, their evolution, and their diversity. It has a myriad of uses: for example, to build phylogenetic trees, to improve productivity and...
40.7K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.4K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.4K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

224
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
224

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enzymatic Deacetylation as a Selective Strategy for <i>O</i>-GlcNAc Identification.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same author

Ribosome biogenesis mediates the translational increase of nonoptimal codon transcripts during IFN-β stimulation.

Canadian journal of microbiology·2026
Same author

Bridging Simplicity and Depth in Single-Cell Proteomics: A Cost-Effective Workflow and an Expanded Framework for Data Evaluation.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same author

Mapping the mammalian dark metabolome by <i>in vivo</i> isotope tracing.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Toward large-scale mass spectrometry-based omics for clinical applications.

Expert review of proteomics·2026
Same author

SPIN: Inkjet-Driven Nanowell Workflow for Scalable and Sensitive Single-Cell Proteomics.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Another 10 years of PLOS Computational Biology: A data-driven reflection on trends in genomics research.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Mobility data resolution needed to inform predictive models of spatial epidemic spread from mobile phone data.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

DeepMethylation: A deep learning framework for tissue-specific DNA methylation prediction and functional variant annotation.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Redefining and estimating the early-phase reproduction ratio for epidemic outbreaks in spatially structured populations.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Optimized phenotype definitions boost GWAS power.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Detection, communication, and individual identification with deep audio embeddings: A case study with North Atlantic right whales.

PLoS computational biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Amplification, Next-generation Sequencing, and Genomic DNA Mapping of Retroviral Integration Sites
09:31

Amplification, Next-generation Sequencing, and Genomic DNA Mapping of Retroviral Integration Sites

Published on: March 22, 2016

18.4K

Genomic data integration systematically biases interactome mapping.

Michael A Skinnider1, R Greg Stacey1, Leonard J Foster1,2

  • 1Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Plos Computational Biology
|October 18, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Integrating genomic data into protein-protein interaction maps improves functional coherence but reduces the discovery of novel interactions. These computationally predicted novel interactions are not more likely to be validated experimentally.

More Related Videos

A Fast and Quantitative Method for Post-translational Modification and Variant Enabled Mapping of Peptides to Genomes
09:10

A Fast and Quantitative Method for Post-translational Modification and Variant Enabled Mapping of Peptides to Genomes

Published on: May 22, 2018

10.0K
Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS
14:58

Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS

Published on: February 17, 2018

11.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Amplification, Next-generation Sequencing, and Genomic DNA Mapping of Retroviral Integration Sites
09:31

Amplification, Next-generation Sequencing, and Genomic DNA Mapping of Retroviral Integration Sites

Published on: March 22, 2016

18.4K
A Fast and Quantitative Method for Post-translational Modification and Variant Enabled Mapping of Peptides to Genomes
09:10

A Fast and Quantitative Method for Post-translational Modification and Variant Enabled Mapping of Peptides to Genomes

Published on: May 22, 2018

10.0K
Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS
14:58

Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS

Published on: February 17, 2018

11.3K

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Systems Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Mapping the complete protein-protein interaction network (interactome) is crucial but challenging.
  • Co-migration techniques enhance interactome mapping throughput and resolution.
  • Accurate identification of interacting protein pairs from large proteomic datasets remains difficult.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To rigorously analyze the impact of integrating external genomic datasets on interactome mapping using co-migration data.
  • To evaluate how genomic data integration affects the discovery of novel protein-protein interactions and functional coherence.
  • To assess the predictive power of computationally identified novel interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of numerous co-migration datasets using diverse experimental and computational approaches.
  • Systematic evaluation of genomic data integration strategies in interactome recovery.
  • Comparison of novel interaction predictions from co-migration data versus genomic data integration.

Main Results:

  • Genomic data integration increases the functional coherence of interactome maps.
  • This integration comes at the cost of reduced power to discover novel protein-protein interactions.
  • Putative novel interactions identified via genomic data integration show no increased likelihood of future experimental validation compared to those from co-migration data alone.

Conclusions:

  • Genomic data integration is a widespread methodology in interactome mapping with unappreciated limitations.
  • The current approach may hinder the discovery of truly novel interactions.
  • Re-evaluation of computational pipelines for interactome mapping is warranted.