Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia
Published on: July 2, 2013
Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery in
Richard L Harvey1, Dylan Edwards2, Kari Dunning3
1The Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chiago, IL (R.L.H., L.M.R.).
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with motor training did not significantly improve arm function in stroke patients compared to sham treatment. Both active and sham rTMS showed similar outcomes in motor function recovery after stroke.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Stroke often results in hemiplegic upper limb motor deficits.
- Motor training is a cornerstone of stroke rehabilitation.
- Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques are being explored to enhance motor recovery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of low-frequency navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the non-injured motor cortex combined with motor training for improving arm motor function in hemiplegic stroke patients.
- To compare the effects of active rTMS versus sham rTMS on motor function outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 199 hemiplegic stroke patients across 12 US rehabilitation centers.
- Participants received either active or sham 1 Hz rTMS before 18 motor training sessions over 6 weeks.
- Outcomes, including Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), were assessed at multiple time points post-treatment.
Main Results:
- Both active and sham rTMS groups demonstrated significant improvements in upper extremity Fugl-Meyer scores (P<0.001).
- No statistically significant difference was observed between the active and sham rTMS groups in the primary endpoint (≥5-point FMA improvement at 6 months) or secondary outcomes (ARAT, WMFT).
- No study-related adverse events were reported, with similar safety profiles for both groups.
Conclusions:
- Goal-oriented motor rehabilitation effectively improves motor function in patients 3 to 12 months post-stroke.
- Navigated low-frequency rTMS to the non-injured motor cortex, when added to motor training, did not provide additional benefit over sham rTMS for upper limb motor function recovery.
- The study suggests that standard motor rehabilitation is effective, but adjunctive rTMS did not enhance outcomes in this patient population.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hierarchy of Motor Control
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Random Error

