Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Comparison of Scale in a Photosynthetic Reactor System for Algal Remediation of Wastewater
Published on: March 6, 2017
A comparison of cholecystitis grading scales
Tarik D Madni1, Paul A Nakonezny, Jonathan B Imran
1From the Department of Surgery (T.D.M., J.B.I., L.T., H.B.C., R.V., A.T.C.), Division of General and Acute Care Surgery (C.T.M., A.L.E., S.L., H.A.P., M.W.C.), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Sciences (P.A.N), University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas.
The Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis (PGS) accurately predicts laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes, outperforming the AAST score in predicting operative difficulty and complications. PGS offers a simpler, operative-based approach to gallbladder disease severity.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary Surgery
- Surgical Outcomes Research
- Medical Device and Technology Evaluation
Background:
- The Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis (PGS) was previously developed to stratify gallbladder disease severity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
- PGS demonstrated excellent interrater reliability and internal validation as an accurate measure of LC outcomes.
- This study compares PGS against the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) score for predicting LC outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive accuracy of the Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis (PGS) against the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) score for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) outcomes.
- To evaluate the reliability and predictive performance of PGS for operative difficulty, case length, conversion rates, and complications.
- To determine if a simpler, operative-based scale like PGS can effectively predict LC outcomes compared to a more complex, multi-input score.
Main Methods:
- Eleven acute care surgeons prospectively graded 179 gallbladders (GBs) using PGS and reported surgical difficulty.
- Three independent raters retrospectively graded GBs using PGS from stored images.
- Three additional surgeons assigned AAST scores; intraclass correlation coefficient assessed reliability for both scales, and regression models estimated perioperative outcomes.
Main Results:
- Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis (PGS) demonstrated superior prediction of operative difficulty (R=0.566 vs. 0.202), case length (R=0.217 vs. 0.037), open conversion rates (AUC=0.904 vs. 0.757), and complication rates (AUC=0.7039 vs. 0.6474) compared to AAST.
- Both PGS and AAST showed similar performance in predicting partial cholecystectomy, readmission, bile leak rates, and length of stay.
- Intraclass correlation coefficients were high for both scales (PGS: 0.8647, AAST: 0.8341).
Conclusions:
- Both the Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis (PGS) and the AAST score are accurate predictors of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) outcomes.
- PGS is a superior predictor of operative difficulty, case length, open conversion rates, and complication rates.
- PGS offers an advantage due to its simplicity and ability to be scored intraoperatively at a single point in time.
Related Concept Videos
Graded Potential
Graded potentials fall into two categories: depolarizing and hyperpolarizing. Depolarizing graded potentials typically occur when sodium (Na+) or...
pH Scale
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Types of Aggregate Grading
Well-graded aggregates include a complete range of necessary size fractions that fit together to create a dense matrix with minimal voids, represented by a smooth, continuous gradation curve. This type of grading ensures good...
Scaling
Sieve Analysis and Grading Curves

