Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Dried Blood Spot Collection of Health Biomarkers to Maximize Participation in Population Studies
Published on: January 28, 2014
Study of selected birth defects among American Indian/Alaska Native population: A multi-state population-based
Lisa K Marengo1, Timothy J Flood2, Mary K Ethen1
1Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas.
Insights
Birth defects like anotia/microtia and cleft lip +/- cleft palate remain significantly higher in American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) newborns compared to non-Hispanic whites. Further research is needed to identify modifiable risk factors for these AI/AN birth defects.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Genetics
Background:
- American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) newborns exhibit a higher prevalence of certain birth defects.
- Investigating known risk factors is crucial to understand these disparities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if known risk factors explain the elevated prevalence of specific birth defects in AI/AN newborns.
- To analyze birth defect prevalence among AI/AN populations compared to non-Hispanic whites (NHWs).
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 12 population-based birth defect surveillance systems (1999-2007).
- Calculated prevalence ratios (PRs) for AI/ANs, adjusting for maternal age, education, diabetes, smoking, and surveillance system type.
- Compared prevalence between non-Hispanic AI/ANs and NHWs, also analyzing any AI/ANs regardless of Hispanic ethnicity.
Main Results:
- Anotia/microtia prevalence was nearly threefold higher, and cleft lip +/- cleft palate was approximately 70% higher in AI/ANs compared to NHWs, even after adjustments.
- Excluding Hispanic individuals from the AI/AN group had minimal impact on the adjusted prevalence ratios.
- Maternal factors accounted for some, but not all, of the elevated birth defect rates.
Conclusions:
- Despite accounting for known risk factors, anotia/microtia and cleft lip +/- cleft palate remain significantly elevated in AI/AN newborns.
- Hispanic ethnicity did not significantly alter the observed birth defect prevalences in AI/AN populations.
- Further investigation is necessary to identify modifiable risk and protective factors for birth defects in AI/AN communities.
Background:
Higher prevalence of selected birth defects has been reported among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) newborns. We examine whether known risk factors for birth defects explain the higher prevalence observed for selected birth defects among this population.
Methods:
Data from 12 population-based birth defects surveillance systems, covering a birth population of 11 million from 1999 to 2007, were used to examine prevalence of birth defects that have previously been reported to have elevated prevalence among AI/ANs. Prevalence ratios (PRs) were calculated for non-Hispanic AI/ANs and any AI/ANs (regardless of Hispanic ethnicity), adjusting for maternal age, education, diabetes, and smoking, as well as type of case-finding ascertainment surveillance system.
Results:
After adjustment, the birth prevalence of two of seven birth defects remained significantly elevated among AI/ANs compared to non-Hispanic whites (NHWs): anotia/microtia was almost threefold higher, and cleft lip +/- cleft palate was almost 70% higher compared to NHWs. Excluding AI/AN subjects who were also Hispanic had only a negligible impact on adjusted PRs.
Conclusions:
Additional covariates accounted for some of the elevated birth defect prevalences among AI/ANs compared to NHWs. Exclusion of Hispanic ethnicity from the AI/AN category had little impact on birth defects prevalences in AI/ANs. NHWs serve as a viable comparison group for analysis. Birth defects among AI/ANs require additional scrutiny to identify modifiable risk and protective factors.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Small Populations
What is Population Genetics?
What are Populations and Communities?
Population Growth
Conservation of Declining Populations
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...

