Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Percutaneous Techniques, Limitations and Challenges for the Failed Surgical Mitral Intervention.
Charles B Nyman1, Douglas C Shook1, Stanton Shernan1
11 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement offers a less invasive option for high-risk patients with failed bioprosthetic valves. Careful management of procedural challenges is crucial for optimal outcomes in this evolving field of valvular heart disease treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Percutaneous therapies are transforming valvular heart disease treatment, expanding beyond transcatheter aortic valve replacement to address mitral valve pathology.
- Surgical mitral valve repair is the gold standard, but bioprosthetic valve use is increasing despite limited lifespan and reoperation risks.
- Less invasive techniques are appealing for aging populations with comorbidities, especially given the risks associated with reoperation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current landscape of percutaneous mitral valve interventions, focusing on transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve (TMIVV) replacement.
- To highlight the benefits and challenges of TMIVV for failed bioprosthetic valves in high-risk surgical patients.
- To emphasize the importance of understanding and mitigating procedural complications for improved patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and clinical data on transcatheter mitral valve interventions.
- Analysis of outcomes and complications associated with transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement.
- Discussion of procedural challenges, mitigation strategies, and therapeutic options.
Main Results:
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) valves used in failed surgical valves show better short-term mortality than open reoperation.
- The US Food and Drug Administration approved transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement for high-risk patients with failed bioprosthetic valves.
- TMIVV is associated with procedural challenges such as malpositioning, embolization, paravalvular leak, and outflow tract obstruction.
Conclusions:
- Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement is a viable, less invasive option for select high-risk patients with degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves.
- Awareness of potential complications and implementation of mitigation strategies are essential for successful TMIVV procedures.
- Continued research and device development are needed to further optimize percutaneous approaches for mitral valve disease.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

