Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Psychology and Individual Behavior01:29

Social Psychology and Individual Behavior

315
Social psychology examines how group dynamics, emotions, and cultural influences shape individual actions and decision-making. These elements interact to form behavioral patterns that affect personal choices and social interactions.The Role of Group DynamicsGroups play a crucial role in shaping behavior by reinforcing norms and expectations. Individuals derive a sense of self from group membership, often aligning their behaviors with group norms to maintain social cohesion. For example, an...
315
Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals01:30

Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals

353
The actions and characteristics of others heavily influence the causes of social behaviors. Emotional expressions serve as powerful social signals, shaping behaviors and interactions in significant ways. Whether through direct observation or subconscious processing, individuals constantly adjust their responses based on the emotions and attributes of those around them.Emotional Cues and Social ResponsesFacial expressions, tone of voice, and body language provide crucial emotional cues that...
353
What is Behavior?00:54

What is Behavior?

10.3K
Behaviors are actions that an organism engages in—they can be related to finding food, reproducing, defending against threats, and many other possible actions. Behaviors include activities related to the environment around the animal—such as migration—as well as social interactions within a species or population. Many behaviors involve motor output—that is, muscle movements—while others involve less visible actions, such as learning.
10.3K
Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

383
Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
383
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.1K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.1K
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

562
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
562

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceived Waist-to-Hip Ratio Predicts Attractiveness, Age, and Parity Judgments in Pre-Contemporary European Portraits of Clothed Women.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same author

Beyond one-size-fits-all: Personalising health communication to drive real behaviour change.

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)·2026
Same author

Attention modulates value normalization in human reinforcement learning by shaping reward encoding.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

A computational model of reward learning and habits on social media.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Reference-point dependent reinforcement learning in humans and rats.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Context induces distortions in value representations across multiple elicitation methods and learning modalities.

Nature communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia
13:08

Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia

Published on: December 2, 2015

9.5K

Can We Infer Inter-Individual Differences in Risk-Taking From Behavioral Tasks?

Stefano Palminteri1,2,3, Coralie Chevallier1,2,3

  • 1Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France.

Frontiers in Psychology
|December 7, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Understanding individual differences in risk-taking is crucial for improving decision-making models. Current behavioral tasks and computational models show low reliability, necessitating new research approaches.

Keywords:
behavioral economicsbehavioral phenotypecorrelational psychologyinter-individual variabilityrisk-taking

More Related Videos

The Three-Chamber Choice Behavioral Task using Zebrafish as a Model System
07:55

The Three-Chamber Choice Behavioral Task using Zebrafish as a Model System

Published on: April 14, 2021

4.5K
Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice
06:58

Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia
13:08

Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia

Published on: December 2, 2015

9.5K
The Three-Chamber Choice Behavioral Task using Zebrafish as a Model System
07:55

The Three-Chamber Choice Behavioral Task using Zebrafish as a Model System

Published on: April 14, 2021

4.5K
Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice
06:58

Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Decision-making research
  • Behavioral economics

Background:

  • Inter-individual differences in risk-taking are critical for refining cognitive and neural models of decision-making.
  • Current behavioral tasks and model-based measures demonstrate poor reliability in assessing these differences.
  • Existing methods may not adequately capture the complexity of risk-taking behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the reasons behind the low reliability of current risk-taking assessment methods.
  • To propose novel approaches for more accurate measurement of individual differences in risk-taking.
  • To enhance cognitive and neural models of decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on risk-taking assessment.
  • Analysis of the limitations of current behavioral tasks and model-based measures.
  • Formulation of hypotheses regarding reliability issues.

Main Results:

  • Behavioral tasks and standard questionnaires show low reliability for measuring individual differences in risk-taking.
  • Model-based measures of risk-taking do not appear to improve reliability.
  • Two potential explanations for these reliability issues are proposed.

Conclusions:

  • Current methods for assessing individual differences in risk-taking lack sufficient reliability.
  • Future research should explore combined approaches, such as repeated online testing and mechanistic computational models, to improve assessment.
  • More reliable measures are needed to advance our understanding of decision-making and inform policy interventions for risky behaviors.