Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
ASSESSING THE CONTRIBUTION OF CROSS-SECTIONS TO THE UNCERTAINTY OF MONTE CARLO CALCULATIONS IN MICRO- AND
C Villagrasa1, M-C Bordage2, M Bueno1
1Institut de Radioprotection et Sûreté nucléaire (IRSN), BP-17, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
This study compared Monte Carlo (MC) simulation results for micro and nanodosimetry. Nanodosimetric results, specifically ionisation cluster size distribution, were sensitive to the physical models used in different MC codes, indicating a significant uncertainty source.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Dosimetry
- Computational Science
Background:
- Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are crucial for micro and nanodosimetry.
- Variations in MC codes and their underlying physical models can introduce uncertainties in simulation results.
- EURADOS Working Group 6, Task Group 6.2, organized an international exercise to assess these uncertainties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the uncertainty in micro and nanodosimetric simulation results due to different electron-impact cross-sections and physical models used in various MC codes.
- To compare simulation outcomes from different MC codes (GEANT4-DNA, PENELOPE, MCNP6, FLUKA, NASIC, PHITS).
- To identify the primary sources of deviation in simulation results.
Main Methods:
- An international Monte Carlo (MC) exercise was conducted involving multiple participants and codes.
- Participants simulated micro and nanodosimetric quantities using their preferred MC codes.
- Results were compared to identify deviations attributable to different cross-sections, tracking methods, and cut-off energies.
Main Results:
- Microdosimetric simulations showed minimal influence from the choice of MC code when the electron source was within the target.
- Nanodosimetric simulations, particularly the mean ionisation cluster size distribution (ICSD), were sensitive to the physical models employed by different MC codes.
- The ICSD was identified as a key metric for studying the impact of cross-section data on simulation uncertainty.
Conclusions:
- The choice of MC code and its associated physical models significantly impacts nanodosimetric results, specifically the ICSD.
- Understanding the uncertainty contribution from different cross-section datasets is crucial for accurate nanodosimetry.
- Further investigation using identical cross-section datasets is planned to isolate the impact of cross-sections on simulation uncertainty.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
The Uncertainty Principle
Finding Volume Using Cross-Sectional Area
Profile Leveling and Cross Sections
Spinal Cord: Cross-sectional Anatomy
Gray Matter and its Components
Central to the gray matter is...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

