Brief resolved unexplained events: Retrospective validation of diagnostic criteria and risk stratification

This study retrospectively evaluated the AAP guidelines for diagnosis and risk stratification of Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUE) in a well-characterized cohort of infants admitted with an Apparent Life Threatening Event (ALTE). Further, using prospective follow-up, we endeavored to determine the safety of implementing ambulatory care for the lower risk BRUE population (LR-BRUE) and estimate the cost-savings of this practice.

Retrospective application of the BRUE criteria on infants younger than 12 months of age who had been admitted with an ALTE from 2006 to 2016 at a single tertiary care center in Lombardy, Italy. ALTE patients were classified into three groups; (1) Not a BRUE; (2) Lower-risk (LR)-BRUE; and (3) Higher-risk (HR)-BRUE. Patients were contacted prospectively to obtain long-term follow-up outcomes and medical records and billing databases were reviewed.

Among the 84 infants admitted for an ALTE, 35 (42%) were not a BRUE, 16 (19%) were a LR-BRUE, and 33 (39%) were a HR-BRUE. Only one of the LR-BRUE patients had a subsequent LR-BRUE event, and was later diagnosed with a seizure disorder. Two HR-BRUE babies had also previously presented with a LR-BRUE. Application of the LR-BRUE guidelines would have decreased health expenditure by 20%. There were no deaths or significant morbidities in either BRUE group.

Applying the recent AAP BRUE guidelines and risk stratification to a well-characterized cohort of admitted ALTE patients is a safe and cost-effective approach. Careful out-patient follow-up is recommended as one of our patients with a LR-BRUE had a recurrence, and was subsequently diagnosed with a seizure disorder.