Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
Published on: April 13, 2013
Intermodel disagreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic CT perfusion imaging
Marly van Assen1, Gert Jan Pelgrim2, Carlo N De Cecco3
1Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, USA; Center for Medical Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Purpose:
To assess the intermodel agreement of different tracer kinetic models to determine myocardial blood flow (MBF) and their diagnostic accuracy in coronary artery disease (CAD) at dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CTMPI).
Methods:
Three porcine hearts perfused in Langendorff mode and 15 patients with suspected CAD and perfusion single photon emission CT (SPECT) were included. Dynamic CTMPI was performed in shuttle-mode (70 kVp, 350mAs/rot) on 3rd generation dual-source CT. In porcine hearts and patients, myocardial segments (AHA-16-segment model) were drawn. Tissue attenuation curves were constructed per segment and arterial input functions were derived from the aorta. True MBF was calculated with input flow and weight of the porcine hearts. In patients, ischemic segments were based on SPECT results. MBF quantification was performed using the VPCT-software, Upslope, Extended Toft (ET), Two-compartment (TC) and Fermi models.
Results:
In porcine hearts, true MBF was 1.88 (interquartile range [IQR]:1.80-2.80)mL/g/min. Diagnostic accuracy was similar for all models: 0.96, 0.99, 0.92, 0.93 and 0.96 for VPCT software, Upslope method, Fermi, ET and TC model. The VPCT software and Upslope method resulted in lower MBF (median 1.44 [1.29-1.58] and 1.39 [1.25-1.59]mL/g/min) compared to the Fermi, ET, and TC model (median values of 1.76 mL/g/min [1.36-2.44], 2.55 mL/g/min [2.20-2.92], and 1.98 mL/g/min [1.60-2.60], respectively [p < 0.001]). In patients, all models showed a significant difference in MBF between the 34 ischemic and 206 non-ischemic segments (p-value<0.001).
Conclusion:
Absolute MBF values are significantly different between the models and a uniform threshold could not be determined; however, diagnostic accuracy for detecting ischemia is similar.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Flow
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Autoregulation of Blood Flow
Chemical Signaling in Autoregulation
Chemical signaling operates at the precapillary sphincter level, inciting either contraction or relaxation....
Applications of Integration to Find Blood Flow
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

