Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Shallow Water Paddling Variants of Water Maze Tests in Mice
Published on: June 3, 2013
Evaluation of pressure-controlled mammography compression paddles with respect to force-controlled compression
C R L P N Jeukens1, T van Dijk2,3, C Berben2
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Cecile.Jeukens@mumc.nl.
Objectives:
To reduce pain and discomfort associated with breast compression in mammography, a pressure-controlled compression paddle was recently introduced. The objective was to evaluate the pressure-controlled paddle by comparing it to the standard force-controlled paddle.
Methods:
Differences of compressed breast thickness (CBT), compression force, compression pressure, and average glandular dose (AGD) between annual follow-up full-field digital mammography exams of 3188 patients were retrospectively examined. Two groups were compared: (1) force-force group (FF-group), both examinations were performed with the force-controlled paddle, and (2) force-pressure group (FP-group), only the follow-up examination was performed with the pressure-controlled paddle. In an additional group of patients, pain scores on a scale of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) were evaluated prospectively (n = 343) who were randomly assigned to either paddle.
Results:
Median differences between follow-up exams in CBT, compression force, compression pressure, and AGD were for the FF- and FP-group respectively - 1.0 vs 0.0 mm (p < 0.001); 0.0 vs - 1.0 daN (p = 0.002); - 1.0 vs - 0.5 kPa (p = 0.005); and 0.05 vs - 0.02 mGy (p < 0.001). These differences were, although statistically significant, clinically non-relevant (defined as ΔCBT > ± 2 mm; Δforce > ± 2 daN; Δpressure > ± 1 kPa and ΔAGD > ± 0.1 mGy). The subanalysis dividing CBT into five categories revealed similar results. The median [interquartile range] pain scores were 6 [3, 7] and 5 [3, 7] for the force-controlled and pressure-controlled paddle, respectively, which was not significantly different (p = 0.113).
Conclusions:
We observed no clinically relevant differences in CBT, compression force, compression pressure, AGD, or pain score between the force- and pressure-controlled paddle. As such, we found no basis for preferring one paddle over the other.
Key Points:
• The pressure-controlled paddle did not show any clinically relevant changes in breast compression parameters compared to the force-controlled paddle. • The pressure-controlled paddle did not lead to significant reduction in pain scores indicated by the patients compared to the force-controlled paddle. • A large variation in compression force and compression pressure was observed in mammography exams for the both the force- and pressure-controlled compression paddle.
Related Concept Videos
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...
Relation Between Tensile Strength and Compressive Strength of Concrete
Density, Specific Weight, Specific Gravity and Compressibility of Fluid
Specific weight represents the weight per unit volume and is calculated by multiplying...
Control System Problem
When forming a closed-loop system, issues can arise if the poles cross into the unstable region, leading to potential...
Combinatorial Gene Control
The expression of more than 30,000 genes is controlled by approximately 2000-3000 transcription factors. This is possible because a single transcription factor can recognize more than one regulatory sequence. The specificity in gene...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

