Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

12:24
Laboratory Estimation of Net Trophic Transfer Efficiencies of PCB Congeners to Lake Trout Salvelinus namaycush from Its Prey
Published on: August 29, 2014
11.4K
Predator-prey feedback in a gyrfalcon-ptarmigan system?
Frédéric Barraquand1,2, Ólafur K Nielsen3
1CNRS Institute of Mathematics of Bordeaux Talence France.
Ecology and Evolution
|January 9, 2019
Summary
Predator-prey feedback, likely driving gyrfalcon and rock ptarmigan population cycles, was investigated using time series analysis. While top-down influence is probable, bottom-up effects cannot be entirely ruled out.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Population Dynamics
- Time Series Analysis
Background:
- Specialist predators' population dynamics are influenced by prey, but they don't always cause prey cycles.
- Distinguishing top-down (predator-driven) from bottom-up (prey-driven) dynamics is crucial for understanding predator-prey coupling.
- Confounding factors like weather can affect population dynamics, complicating analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To infer the degree of coupling between gyrfalcon (Falco rusticolus) and rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta) populations.
- To assess the influence of abiotic (weather) variables on these populations.
- To differentiate between top-down and bottom-up predator-prey dynamics using time series models.
Main Methods:
- Utilized multivariate autoregressive (MAR) models with 1 and 2 time lags (MAR(1) and MAR(2)).
- Contrasted models assuming predator-prey feedback (top-down) versus prey-driven dynamics (bottom-up).
- Employed simulations to evaluate model identification accuracy and robustness.
Main Results:
- MAR(1) models suggested predator-prey feedback and weak weather effects on gyrfalcons.
- MAR(2) models allowed for independent cycling and suggested bottom-up scenarios, fitting data better but showing less realistic correlations.
- Simulations indicated MAR(1) top-down models are more prone to misidentification as bottom-up than vice versa.
Conclusions:
- Predator-prey feedback is the most likely driver of oscillations in the gyrfalcon-ptarmigan system.
- Bottom-up dynamics remain a possibility, requiring further investigation.
- Ecological time series analysis, enhanced by simulations, can improve understanding of complex ecological interactions and identify key drivers.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
21.5K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
21.5K
Feedback Inhibition
57.1K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
57.1K
Feedback Loops
64.4K
In most cases, excessive hormone production is prevented by negative feedback—a loop that starts with a stimulus inducing the release of a particular substance, like a hormone, to maintain a certain level before triggering a signal that results in a decrease in further release of the hormone.
64.4K
Effects of feedback
1.0K
Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
1.0K
Feedback control systems
720
Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
720
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
661
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
661

