Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
A cognitive forcing tool to mitigate cognitive bias - a randomised control trial.
Eoin D O'Sullivan1, Susie J Schofield2
1Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Cres, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK. eoindosullivan@gmail.com.
A cognitive forcing tool did not reduce diagnostic errors in a randomized trial, despite positive user feedback. Further research is needed to validate its clinical utility for reducing cognitive bias in medical decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Clinical Decision Making
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Cognitive bias is a significant factor contributing to diagnostic errors, presenting challenges in education and clinical practice.
- Understanding the impact of cognitive bias is crucial for improving patient safety and healthcare outcomes.
- Diagnostic errors remain a persistent issue in medicine, necessitating innovative solutions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a cognitive forcing tool in reducing diagnostic errors.
- To explore the mechanisms through which a cognitive forcing tool might influence clinical decision-making.
- To assess the perceived impact and usability of the cognitive forcing tool among medical professionals.
Main Methods:
- A single-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted using an online, case-based approach from January 2017 to September 2018.
- Participants included medical professionals of varying seniority across the UK, Republic of Ireland, and North America.
- Qualitative "think aloud" interviews were conducted with 20 doctors to understand their experience with the tool.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in diagnostic error rates was observed between the intervention and control groups (mean 2.8 vs 3.1 cases correct, P=0.49).
- Doctors across all grades demonstrated errors related to cognitive bias.
- Qualitative data indicated the cognitive forcing strategy was well-received, with users reporting a subjectively positive impact on accuracy and thoughtfulness.
Conclusions:
- The quantitative results did not support the use of the cognitive forcing tool to improve diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice.
- Despite the lack of statistical significance, the positive qualitative feedback suggests the tool has potential merit and face validity.
- Further investigation is warranted to determine the clinical utility and optimal implementation of cognitive forcing strategies.
More Related Videos
09:43A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
Published on: April 15, 2014
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Dissonance
Language and Cognition
Cognitive Therapy
Cognition and Behavior
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Introduction to Cognitive Psychology
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...