Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Focus on Standardized Salivary Gland Ultrasound Protocol in Connective Tissue Disease Research
Published on: October 13, 2023
RCVS2 score and diagnostic approach for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome
Eva A Rocha1, M Akif Topcuoglu1, Gisele S Silva1
1From the Department of Neurology (E.A.R., A.B.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (E.A.R., G.S.S.), Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (G.S.S.), São Paulo, Brazil; and Department of Neurology (M.A.T.), Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Objective:
To develop a method to distinguish reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) from other large/medium-vessel intracranial arteriopathies.
Methods:
We identified consecutive patients from our institutional databases admitted in 2013-2017 with newly diagnosed RCVS (n = 30) or non-RCVS arteriopathy (n = 80). Admission clinical and imaging features were compared. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to develop a discriminatory score. Score validity was tested in a separate cohort of patients with RCVS and its closest mimic, primary angiitis of the CNS (PACNS). In addition, key variables were used to develop a bedside approach to distinguish RCVS from non-RCVS arteriopathies.
Results:
The RCVS group had significantly more women, vasoconstrictive triggers, thunderclap headaches, normal brain imaging results, and better outcomes. Beta coefficients from the multivariate regression model yielding the best c-statistic (0.989) were used to develop the RCVS2 score (range -2 to +10; recurrent/single thunderclap headache; carotid artery involvement; vasoconstrictive trigger; sex; subarachnoid hemorrhage). Score ≥5 had 99% specificity and 90% sensitivity for diagnosing RCVS, and score ≤2 had 100% specificity and 85% sensitivity for excluding RCVS. Scores 3-4 had 86% specificity and 10% sensitivity for diagnosing RCVS. The score showed similar performance to distinguish RCVS from PACNS in the validation cohort. A clinical approach based on recurrent thunderclap headaches, trigger and normal brain scans, or convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage correctly diagnosed 25 of 37 patients with RCVS2 scores 3-4 across the derivation and validation cohorts.
Conclusion:
RCVS can be accurately distinguished from other intracranial arteriopathies upon admission, using widely available clinical and imaging features.
Classification Of Evidence:
This study provides Class II evidence that the RCVS2 score accurately distinguishes patients with RCVS from those with other intracranial arteriopathies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
z Scores and Unusual Values
This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...

