Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Published on: February 10, 2017
A Comparison of Endoscopic Reduction for Medial Blowout Fractures Using a Bioresorbable Panel and Silastic Sheet
Joo Yeon Kim1, Tae Young Jung2, Jae Hwan Kwon1
1Department of Otolaryngology Head-Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine.
Background:
The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of endoscopic endonasal reduction using a bioresorbable panel and silastic sheet packed with Merocel for blowout fractures of the medial orbital wall.
Design:
Retrospective study.
Methods:
The study group consisted of 147 patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal reduction of a blowout fracture of the medial orbital wall between January 2005 and December 2016. Fifty-seven fractures were repaired using a splint formed by a silastic sheet and Merocel (splint group), whereas 90 fractures were repaired using a bioresorbable panel for interposition (interposition group). Postoperative complications and surgical outcomes of the 2 groups were compared.
Results:
Preoperative diplopia in both groups (n = 30) was resolved except 1 in interposition group after the reduction. Enophthalmos was resolved in 10 cases in the splint group and in 6 cases in the interposition group. In postoperative CT scans, 20 of the 57 cases in the splint group exhibited under- or overcorrection, compared with 9 of the 90 cases in the interposition group (P < 0.05). There were no sinus infections or implant-related side effects in the interposition group except for implant extrusion in 4 cases, whereas 7 cases developed sinusitis in the splint group (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Endonasal endoscopic reduction using a bioresorbable panel may be considered as a surgical alternative for the treatment of medial orbital blowout fractures.
Insights
A bioresorbable panel offers a promising alternative for endoscopic endonasal reduction of medial orbital wall blowout fractures, showing fewer complications and better outcomes than silastic sheet splints.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Otorhinolaryngology
- Medical Engineering
Background:
- Medial orbital wall blowout fractures present complex reconstructive challenges.
- Endoscopic endonasal reduction is a minimally invasive surgical approach.
- Comparing novel bioresorbable materials with traditional silastic implants is crucial for optimizing outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of endoscopic endonasal reduction for medial orbital wall blowout fractures.
- To evaluate surgical outcomes and postoperative complications between bioresorbable panels and silastic sheet splints with Merocel packing.
- To determine the optimal interposition material for endoscopic medial orbital wall fracture repair.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective comparative study of 147 patients with medial orbital wall blowout fractures.
- Group 1: 57 fractures repaired with silastic sheet and Merocel splint.
- Group 2: 90 fractures repaired with bioresorbable panel interposition.
Main Results:
- The bioresorbable panel group showed significantly fewer cases of under- or overcorrection (9/90 vs. 20/57, P<0.05).
- Sinusitis occurred less frequently in the bioresorbable panel group (0/90 vs. 7/57, P<0.05).
- Implant extrusion occurred in 4 cases in the bioresorbable panel group; no implant-related side effects were noted in the silastic group.
Conclusions:
- Endoscopic endonasal reduction using a bioresorbable panel is an effective treatment for medial orbital blowout fractures.
- Bioresorbable panels demonstrate a favorable safety profile and reduce postoperative complications compared to silastic splints.
- This approach offers a viable surgical alternative for medial orbital wall reconstruction.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Wood Panel Products
Oxidation-Reduction Reactions
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Flow Sheet
Here's a closer look at the examples of flowsheets commonly used by nurses:
Graphic Sheet Documentation:
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

