Related Experiment Videos
Social licence and the general public's attitudes toward research based on linked administrative health data: a
P Alison Paprica1, Magda Nunes de Melo2, Michael J Schull2
1ICES (Paprica, Nunes de Melo, Schull), Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Paprica, Schull), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Schull), Toronto, Ont. alison.paprica@utoronto.ca.
Background:
Both the research literature and headline news stories indicate that the public cares about how their health data are used. The objective of this study was to learn more about the general public's attitudes toward users and uses of linked administrative health data held by ICES in Ontario, Canada.
Methods:
Eight focus groups, with a total of 65 members of the general public, were conducted in urban and northern settings in Ontario, Canada, in 2015 and 2017 using qualitative market research panels established by a market research/public opinion research firm.
Results:
Three major themes emerged: (a) the need for assurance about privacy and security, (b) general support for research based on linked administrative health data with some conditions and (c) mixed and more negative reaction when there is private sector involvement. Two minor themes were also derived from the data: (a) low knowledge and understanding of how linked administrative health data are used for research and (b) mixed views on the need to obtain consent when health data do not include identifying information.
Interpretation:
The public generally supports research based on linked administrative health data, but there is no blanket approval. Researchers and organizations that hold health data should engage with members of the public to understand and address their concerns about privacy and security and to ensure that research is aligned with social licence, particularly where there is private sector involvement.